I'm a C++ developer from Italy. I like programming, science, jogging and dogs.
I have been disillusioned with Wikipedia. When I first discovered it I was admired and rejoiced for the marvelous things I found in it. So I jumped in. Alas, I found that whatever you do to articles, they keep changing; and 99% of the time they do so without any improvement. In practice they eternally fluctuate between random levels of quality.
For that reason, I left.
Anyhow, Wikipedia —at least the English Wikipedia— is very useful as a starting point. It just isn't an encyclopedia (and shouldn't be linked to by everyone). Perhaps we have just to assimilate the new category of "wiki", i.e. a sort of dump bin for information, in addition to our traditional categories of "book", "essay", etc. ("infowiki", anyone?). So now if I spot a chance to improve something with little effort I'll probably do it anyway.
I'd love for Wikipedia to have a process with serious review, though. It would become the greatest body of knowledge the humanity has ever produced.
|This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at