Your wikipedia articles may live longer if you are one of the friends
Or at least one of the chosen few, study finds .
Trivia sections should be encouraged
It seems a few people keep adding the negative note on all pages which have trivia sections - but not only can they be interesting, they also seem very popular. And quite often you can NOT incorporate them in the main text without the main text being a weird bloatware article. Yes, it is supposed to be a respectable encyclopedia and they don't have that, but it is also supposed to be used by people right? It lives by their interest.--IceHunter (talk) 22:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
User choice of what to see on pages
Seems more and more wikipedia pages are being overrun by tons of tags at the top of pages with warnings and dictates and other junk that few really care about - it would be nice if us ordinary users could switch the display of that (on a per users basis). I would have posted that in a suggestions forum - but i can't seem to find one.--IceHunter (talk) 06:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Logging in to wikipedia
What to avoid
Wikipedia tells us: "Avoid posting a generic warning template if actively involved in the edit war, it can be seen as aggressive." - I would add: avoid using warning template as all - manually write to others what it is you wish to complain about. --IceHunter (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
|Yum! IceHunter (talk) 16:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)|