This user helped get "Cervix" listed at Did You Know on the main page on June 2014.
This user helped get "Stapes" listed at Did You Know on the main page on January 2014.
This user helped get "Violence against doctors in China" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped "Anatomical terms of motion" become a featured list on May 2014.
This user cowrote "Adrenal gland" become a good article on October 2015.
This user helped "Cervix" become a good article on June 2014.
This user cowrote "Cranial nerves" become a good article on August 2014.
This user helped "Foramen spinosum" become a good article.
This user helped "Parathyroid gland" become a good article.
This user cowrote "Pudendal nerve" become a good article on October 2014.
This user helped "Recurrent laryngeal nerve" become a good article.
This user cowrote "Sebaceous gland" become a good article on September 2014.
This user helped "Stapes" become a good article on January 2014.
This user helped "Suspensory muscle of duodenum" become a good article on March 2014.

User:LT910001

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User User talk WPANATOMY WPMED
⚕ This user is a member of WikiProject Medicine.
Blutkreislauf.png This user is a member of
WikiProject Anatomy.
ECG Principle fast.gif This user is a member of
WikiProject Physiology.
Eurasian otter.jpg This user is a WikiOtter.
Symbol support vote.svg This user has reviewed 60 Good Article nominations on Wikipedia.

Barnstars[edit]

Reviews[edit]

Peer review[edit]

2015[edit]

On technical writing:


They told me that if your reader can't understand your opening sentence, he's not going to read the rest of it, and if your reader doesn't read it, what's the point of writing?

I read Science and NEJM every week, and I couldn't figure it out the first time I read it.

This would be a good example for a writing course.

As I explained in the edit box, you can't define a word in terms of other words that your readers don't understand. If they don't know what "aneuploid" means, they're unlikely to know what "monoploid" means.

And providing a link for the unfamiliar word is no excuse. Every professional editor I know agrees that you can't do that. You have to include everything in the work itself that your reader needs for a basic understanding of your point. That's why I was glad to see that Wikipedia agreed in WP:NOTJOURNAL.

I hope I didn't drive [that user] off Wikipedia. Most people don't enjoy having their writing changed. I don't usually enjoy it myself. But an ordinary reader has to understand a Wikipedia article -- at least the introduction.

-- Nbauman 09:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC) [1]

2014[edit]