This user helped get "32 Old Slip" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 September 2014.
This user helped get "MTA Arts & Design" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 September 2014.
This user helped "Nine Inch Nails" become a featured article.
This user helped "32 Old Slip" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Amnesiac (album)" become a good article.
This user helped "Better Out Than In" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Clarence Chesterfield Howerton" become a good article.
This user helped "Hasil Adkins" become a good article.
This user contributed to "Jessica Gomes" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Kowloon Walled City" become a good article.
This user made modest contributions to "Second Generation (advertisement)" become a good article.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nuvola apps personal unisex.png
Nuvola apps ksirc.png
Wikipedia Administrator.svg
Newspaper Cover2.svg
Javascript icon.svg
Icon tools.svg
Nuvola filesystems folder template.png
Nuvola mimetypes tar.png
Original Barnstar Hires.png

NYPD police boat, Brooklyn Bridge and Downtown Brooklyn at sunset.JPG

Show another Commons-logo.svg
Admin mop.PNG This user is an administrator (verify) and has taken 9898 logged actions.
Wikipedia-Crystal clear-advancedsetting.png This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
MedCom laurel.png This user believes in civility and assuming good faith.
CVU.svg This user fights vandalism.
Face-angel.svg This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.
Smiley head happy.png This user is happy to help new users. Leave a message here.
Wiki-tech-logo.svg This user develops
user scripts;
Crystal Clear action run.svg This user operates a bot account, MusikBot.
This user is proud
to be a Wikipedian.
My conscious is a jukebox


Plato said "To do is to be". Jean-Paul Sartre said "To be is to do". Frank Sinatra said "Do-be-do-be-do".

I live in New York City. Musician, photographer, web developer, chess player. Knowledge hungry, always seeking something new.

I began in 2003/04-ish as a casual reader of Wikipedia, making occasional minor edits as an IP user. My first registered edit that I'm aware of was made in June of 2006. I have had at least one other (now abandoned) account since then, before settling on this username in 2011. My addiction grew, and in May 2012 I finally decided I wanted to give back to the community and start making more substantial contributions, and since March 2013 I've been here almost daily.

I occasionally get emails from Lila Tretikov thanking me for donating $3 USD to the Wikimedia Foundation. I must have set up an automated payment at some point. I don't mind, though. Tax-deductible money well spent :)


My philosophy as a Wikipedian is pretty straightforward. I try to make it fun and avoid disputes. I sometimes create new articles when I see the need for one, but in general I enjoy improving existing ones. I love music and am fascinated by big cities, and tend to focus my editing on these topics. Content creation is important to me, but the bulk of my 50,000+ edits are owed to fighting vandalism. It keeps me engaged and I get the same rewarding feeling. As of late I've also been busy working on a bot, tools and various scripts.

As an administrator I'm heavily involved with maintenance of the project. As always I spend much time in preventing abuse of the wiki, but I try to help out anywhere there's a backlog. I probably lean more toward an inclusionist except for recently created articles with major fallacies. I am an absolute stickler about verifiability, and have very little patience in dealing with BLP violations and spam.

Edit warring is particularly baffling to me. I don't like how many people think or assume WP:BRD is something you are required to follow, or an excuse to revert. I'm all for the philosophy, but incorporate it into your own editing and don't try to force it onto others. Citing BRD in your edit summary feels aggressive. Your rationale should explain why you reverted, not that BRD says you should, or that you can. Instead, something like "Reverted good-faith edits..." can make a world of a difference when reverting disputable content. It is more friendly and conducive to a collaborative environment, and helps prevent any potential temperament.

I have a lot of faith in new users. Technical mistakes are simple and you should help them, as Wikipedia isn't incredibly user-friendly. On a more social level, it's crucial to give newcomers a good impression of the community. In my early days I was accused of sockpuppetry. Fortunately I was resilient. I believed in Wikipedia and did not want to give up. I feel like many users would have been scared off and abandoned the project altogether. The experience shaped the Wikipedian that I am today. It taught me how important it is to be careful with new users, and always assume good faith. It makes me wonder how many other would-be long-lasting contributors we must have lost...


I use a modified version of the Vector skin with the Monobook background. My wikieditor is monospaced with syntax highlighting enabled. I find these tools indispensable:

Recent progress

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 22:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

New userspace draft

Use {{db-u1}} for user speedy deletion of own pages.

Under construction icon-blue.svg

Find sources: Books · Scholar · Recent news · Free images · · New York Times · Wikipedia Reference Search

Wikimedia Foundation RGB logo with text.svg