User:Ohnoitsjamie/drafts/
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 13:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
- (Ohnoitsjaime | talk | contributions)
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Statement of the dispute[edit]
This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.
Description[edit]
This user has been waging a campaign to insert this POV edit into the Big Spring, Texas article since December of 2005 under IPs such including User:65.122.236.133, User:65.122.232.3, User:209.181.19.117, and user names User:Ohnoitsjayme (banned) User:Ohnoitsjaime (banned), User:Happyjoe, . Multiple users have attempted to discuss the NPOV problems with the passage, but no good faith efforts have been made by the user to stick to verifiable and neutral statements. Three 3RRs have been filed and the page has been semi-protected twice. OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Evidence of disputed behavior[edit]
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
Applicable policies[edit]
{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}
- Sockpuppetry
- 3RR
- NPOV
- Civility
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute[edit]
(provide diffs and links)
Users certifying the basis for this dispute[edit]
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
Other users who endorse this summary[edit]
(sign with ~~~~)
Response[edit]
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Outside view[edit]
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Discussion[edit]
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.