This user helped "A Trick of the Tail" become a good article on 15 April 2015.
This user helped "Abbey Road" become a good article on 25 February 2014.
This user helped "Ashford, Kent" become a good article on 8 June 2014.
This user helped "Atom Heart Mother" become a good article on 25 September 2012.
This user helped "Blackwall Tunnel" become a good article on 16 July 2013.
This user helped "Dartford Crossing" become a good article on 12 July 2014.
This user helped "Denmark Street" become a good article on 4 July 2014.
This user helped "Duke (album)" become a good article on 1 June 2015.
This user helped "Graham Chapman" become a good article on 13 June 2015.
This user helped "Haim (band)" become a good article on 12 February 2015.
This user helped "Hammond organ" become a good article on 20 August 2013.
This user helped "Ian Gillan" become a good article on 1 February 2013.
This user helped "Ika Hügel-Marshall" become a good article on 10 March 2015.
This user helped "Jaywick" become a good article on 2 January 2015.
This user helped "Keith Moon" become a good article on 11 April 2013.
This user helped "Leslie speaker" become a good article on 30 November 2013.
This user helped "Made in Japan (Deep Purple album)" become a good article on 4 June 2014.
This user helped "Mellotron" become a good article on 25 February 2014.
This user helped "Mersea Island" become a good article on 8 December 2014.
This user helped "Nord Stage" become a good article on 23 August 2012.
This user helped "Pink Floyd: Live at Pompeii" become a good article on 10 December 2012.
This user helped "Quadrophenia" become a good article on 11 February 2015.
This user helped "Rhodes Piano" become a good article on 25 February 2014.
This user helped "Selling England by the Pound" become a good article on 4 April 2015.
This user helped "Snake Pass" become a good article on 9 April 2015.
This user helped "Something/Anything?" become a good article on 6 October 2013.
This user helped "Stones in the Park" become a good article on 21 April 2013.
This user helped "The Beatles (album)" become a good article on 19 July 2014.
This user helped "The Who" become a good article on 30 September 2013.
This user helped "The Yes Album" become a good article on 13 August 2014.
This user helped "Tommy (album)" become a good article on 18 September 2014.
This user helped "Twyford Down" become a good article on 9 March 2013.
This user helped "Ummagumma" become a good article on 12 September 2012.
This user helped "University of Michigan Men's Glee Club‎" become a good article on 13 July 2014.
This user helped "Van der Graaf Generator" become a good article on 31 October 2012.
This user helped "Watford Gap services" become a good article on 24 May 2014.
This user helped "West Pier" become a good article on 11 May 2015.
This user helped "Who's Next" become a good article on 31 December 2014.
This user helped "Won't Get Fooled Again" become a good article on 25 January 2015.
This user helped "Woolwich Ferry" become a good article on 15 March 2015.
This user helped "Yellow Submarine (album)" become a good article on 5 August 2014.
This user helped "You Never Give Me Your Money‎" become a good article on 15 July 2014.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.

User:Ritchie333

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
My creative side
Ritchie333
Wikipediholic mug.jpg
Wikipedia. It's a mug's game, really
Born yes
Known for edits, mostly
Nuvola apps kuser.svg This user may sometimes share an IP address with: Rhondamerrick.
Noia 64 apps karm.svg This user has been on Wikipedia for 9 years, 6 months and 24 days.
Wikipedia-logo.png
This user has made over
32,000 edits on this Wikipedia.
Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing The Who to Good Article status.
Symbol support vote.svg This user has significantly contributed to
44 Good Articles on Wikipedia.
JSTOR icon.png This user has access to JSTOR through The Wikipedia Library
BNA This user has access to the British Newspaper Archive through The Wikipedia Library
BuckinghamshireCo.show.2006.png
This editor believes in less bull and more writing.
Conrad von Soest, 'Brillenapostel' (1403).jpg This user pledges to return to Old Fashioned Wikipedian Values.
Peter Hammill.jpg
This user likes Van der Graaf Generator, and thinks you should too if your ears are ready for it.
Don't abbreviate as Wiki (no text).png This user feels physical pain when hearing others refer to Wikipedia as "Wiki".
British dimpled glass pint jug with ale.jpg
This user prefers having a pint to collecting barnstars, though if you'd like to give me a barnstar anyway, that's okay.
Obscured jaguar.jpg Beware! This user is a known talk page stalker.
Suede on Nord Electro.jpg
This user loves cats and prefers to spend some time with them when he sees an argument approaching.
The Sun.svg
This user hates The Sun and thinks anyone who treats it as a reliable source for a biography of a living person is stark raving mad.
1537 pending submissions This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for creation. You can help!
WikiProject Musical Instruments This user is a member of the
Musical Instruments WikiProject.
Fender Stratocaster Headstock.jpg This user is a part of
WikiProject Rock music
Record-Album-02.jpg This user is a member of
WikiProject Albums.
Beatles logo.svg This user is a member of
WikiProject The Beatles.
Dispersion prism.jpg This user is a member of the Pink Floyd WikiProject.
EnglandKent.svg This user is a member of
WikiProject Kent

Ritchie333 is a fortysomething software engineer, musician and real ale drinker.

Shortcuts[edit]

Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 32388
Edits+Deleted 35216
Pages deleted 335
Pages restored 7
Pages protected 75
Pages unprotected 6
Protections modified 4
Users blocked 10
Users reblocked 7
Users unblocked 30
User rights modified 1
Users created 1

Zen and the art of Wikipedia Maintenance[edit]

Domestos Reliable Sources. Kills all A7s. Dead.
Soft words turneth away ANI threads.
  1. Always have sources to hand when creating and expanding articles. Don't write articles based upon your own personal hypotheses and inferences. Don't write articles based upon knowledge that you half-remember learning, but have no idea from where or from whom. Write articles based upon actual, concrete, sources[1], and ensure that the article cites those sources. If you half-remember something, go and hunt up a source that covers it first, then write.[2] If you don't do this, expect your articles to be speedy deleted, nominated for deletion or asking the AfC help desk why your article was declined.
  2. Calculus is good for mathematicians, and it's good for Wikipedians too. Don't worry about how competent an editor is now - focus on the first derivative and worry about their rate of competence change. A good newbie can teach themselves to become more competent. A bad newbie never will.
  3. "I think a good number of voices of compassion, balance and reason are probably closer to the Wiki community than most people realise. I don’t think the 91% male editors are all single with no female partners, sisters or daughters."[3]
  4. In any debate about the merits of a musical act, be it solo or band, as discussion continues, the probability of comparing the perceived quality of the act to Justin Bieber approaches 1.
  5. Every time you start a thread on WP:ANI, God[4] kills a kitten.
  6. My own wikocratic oath is : First, cause no drama'.'[5]
  7. I really wish wikilawyering were against policy.[6]
  8. "If I had a choice between trusting a compulsive liar locked in a straitjacket in a padded cell scrawling his inane ramblings about how the lizard people secretly run the world through an extensive mind control programme on the wall of said cell with his own faeces and trusting what is written in The Sun, I'd flip a coin because they truly are about equivalent in reliability."[7]
  9. "It's important to remember that however set-apart and distinct we feel the project is, the point of contact with the real world is the user of the encyclopedia, the person who pops into Wikipedia to find some needed information or just to browse a bit, and couldn't care less what the Wiki-world experience is like to those inside of it" [8]
  10. If somebody tells you to "get a life", they might have a point. Enjoy editing Wikipedia, but don't let it consume you, and make sure you experience the real world enough to get perspective on things. Especially if you have a wife and kids.
  11. When people have problems with editing wiki markup, it's a problem with the software's poor interface, not the end user.
  12. If you see an angry rant on a talk page about your revert to that article that talks about "the truth" but ends with — Preceding unsigned comment added by..., you can probably ignore it. If it's an IP, you probably can rest safe that your revert hasn't even been touched.
  13. There is no race to be "first" to answer a question on WP:HD, WP:RD, WP:AFCHD and WP:ANI .... all you get is an edit conflict with SineBot for your troubles if you're lucky.
  14. If you want to be an admin, find your best friend's car, take out the rotor arm, slash the tyres, then tell them to their face you did it. If you can survive the abuse you get back, you might have what it takes.
  15. Twinkle has a lot of magic buttons to automate tasks. None of them are for writing content and adding sources. The best content editors ignore twinkle, and vice versa.
  16. Assume good faith can mean deleting an article or doing a blanket revert, then apologising to affected editors that you needed to do it.
  17. Those that can, do. Those that can't, bicker about the manual of style or the citation guidelines. I mean, who cares that somebody's falsely accused of murder - just put that bloody full stop BEFORE the ref tag.
  18. Make your articles good or utterly brilliant if you so wish, but beware the lure of the rubber stamp and remember that if it doesn't improve the encyclopedia, balls to it.
  19. If somebody really wants to win an argument, just let them. You'll live. As Mark Twain put it, "Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of good example."[9](other religious magazines are available)
  20. If I see one more editor throw the term WP:RS at a newbie without explaining what it stands for and why it's relevant, I will scream.
  21. One of the most dangerous habits you can get into is to take Wikipedia too seriously. Dozens of editors have been indefinitely blocked at ANI and Arbcom because the encyclopedia is super-duper important and blocking them is soooooo unfair.
  22. If you use personal attacks in a debate, you're wrong. Even if you think you're right, you're still wrong. That the other party is also wrong is irrelevant.
  23. Any WP:CIVIL or WP:NPA based block of a user with at least 3 FAs will cause more problems than it solves.
  24. Domestos Reliable Sources. Kills all AfDs. Dead.

Other essays[edit]

In mainspace[edit]

In here[edit]

Other essays I happen to like[edit]

One revert guarantee[edit]

If you think one of my edits makes the encyclopedia worse, revert it. Please try and leave a good edit summary or discuss it on the talk page, though. In return, I pledge I will only revert your changes once and once only, if at all. If you revert back again, then I'll go to the talk page. Or I might decide you're correct. Either way, I have no more right to edit this place than you.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Reliable sources are many and varied but are generally not : Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Soundcloud, blogs (that aren't written by notable journalists for the New York Times or something of that level) and the website you created yesterday
  2. ^ User:Uncle G/On sources and content#Always work from and cite sources
  3. ^ Rhonda on female Wikipedians
  4. ^ or another suitable deity of your choice
  5. ^ NE Ent (30 October 2012). "kitchen, heat". ANI. 
  6. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AEditor_assistance%2FRequests&diff=548472838&oldid=548464648
  7. ^ Tom Morris, Wikipedia:Reliable sources Noticeboard, 11 October 2012
  8. ^ Beyond My Ken : The nature of Wikipedia
  9. ^ Year of Grace: A Daily Companion. Rowman & Littlefield. 1999. p. 27. ISBN 9781580510622.