This is my journal associated with my Wikipedia editing. I have other MediaWiki journals, which I'll link to some other day. See also Special:Contributions/RobLa; it may be that I'm making changes to articles in the main namespace rather than just updating my journal.
- 10:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
1/ Having a discussion over on User_talk:RobLa/Condorcet about Condorcet method and Copeland's method, as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject Voting systems. Once again, I'm staying up WAYYYY too late here in the Pacific Time Zone.
- 01:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
1/ Created User:RobLa/WikiProjects as an experiment. More experiments to come....
- updated 10:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
1/ I'm staying up WAYYYY too late again. Worked on Political eras of the United States, and weighed in Talk:2021 storming of the United States Capitol earlier today (er... make that "yesterday"; it's still Thursday, January 7 as far as I'm concerned)
- 07:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
1/ Fixing redirects in old #2020-07-03 entry from "Draft:Charles Joseph Minard in Infographics" and from "Draft:Charles Joseph Minard in information visualization" to User:RobLa/sandbox/Charles Joseph Minard in information visualization. I'm not quite done yet....
- 21:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
1/ There was an interesting story in the Washington Post about Publix yesterday. It makes me want to start a United States supermarket chain ownership article. Perhaps I'll start such a thing here: User:RobLa/United States supermarket chain ownership. It appears as though we already have List of supermarket chains in the United States, but it doesn't give the historic perspective.
- updated: 05:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- updated: 20:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- updated: 09:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
1/ my mind is still blown that yesterday (August 8) was the 40th anniversary of Xanadu coming out in the movie theaters. I didn't actually see Xanadu until September or October, but there are many mysteries of my childhood that make total sense to me now. To be clear, Xanadu was a terrible movie, but I really thought the ELO side of the soundtrack was pretty good. I usually skipped over "Don't Walk Away", which wasn't a very good song. Well, it seems that the current owners of Xanadu movie copyright are hoping that it makes a kitschy comeback: https://twitter.com/hashtag/Xanadu40
I had personal reasons for listening to the radio on the evening of August 7, 1980 (past midnight; thus, August 8) that had nothing to do with the movie. As I was trying to get to sleep, I'm pretty sure I heard "I'm Alive by ELO". It had personal significance for me.
- updated: 09:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
2/ Fixing up the header for my first journal entry of August 9, and making a second one while I'm at it.
- updated 23:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
1/ I would love some help on Draft:2018 New York's 14th congressional district election. Maybe I can get some help on Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Most of the current draft is copied from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
- updated 21:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
1/ my thoughts on the items to sections to articles
- link: #items_sections_articles
I was explaining to a friend what my idea of the idealized form of article growth on Wikipedia is (and on the other wikis I'm involved with). I'm curious what other people think (please comment in the "User talk:RobLa#items_sections_articles" section I created on the User_talk:RobLa page).
In the idealized growth of English Wikipedia articles, a "thing" (topic, subject, item, whatever) follows this pattern:
- the item gets mentioned in the prose of a well-established, notable article
- the item gets mentioned in a few sentences (or even a paragraph) in the prose of well-established article
- the item gets a titled section in a well-established article, probably with 2-3 paragraphs. By this point, the item is established as notable information about the subject of the well-established article. All of the edit wars have been fought to establish this.
- the item is overwhelming the well-established article, and it's time for the item to have its own article.
Note that I'm careful to use the phrase "the prose of a well-established, notable article" rather than "the big stupid set of template-heavy tables that dominates low-quality articles". It seems to me that we have a lot of template-heavy articles that are dominated by tables and don't tell a story. I hope we can fix that.
- link: whoa, LST! (#LST) - 22:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
2/ whoa, I'm trippin'! It seems it's possible to do some pretty trippy things with labeled section transclusion (see Help:LST). Actually see this page: User:RobLa/CA-21-2020-election. The colored maps on that page really tell a story. Am I just seeing colors, or are those really a thing?
- updated: 23:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- updated: 22:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
1/ Hmm....which of these seems more historic
Don't mind me, just thinking aloud about why 2018 New York's 14th congressional district election is a red link, and 2018 California's 10th congressional district election isn't.
- updated: sometime after 1/ was
2/ Ok, now 2018 New York's 14th congressional district election is a redirect to 2018 United States House of Representatives elections in New York#District_14, which is marginally better than before.
- updated: 23:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
3/ See also Special:Contributions/RobLa; it may be that I'm making changes to articles in the main namespace rather than just updating my journal. For example, I've been trying to figure out what happened with the Audrey Denney article and all the redirects to-and-from what used to be a promising article. She's running for office again in California's 1st congressional district.
- updated: 00:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)'
4/ I really should spend some time doing other things than editing wikis. I hope someone else writes the article I suggested here:
I really think Draft:2018 New York's 14th congressional district election should exist, and that 2018 New York's 14th congressional district election should be more than a redirect.
- updated: 23:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
1/ Renamed "Draft:Charles Joseph Minard in Infographics" to "Draft:Charles Joseph Minard in information visualization" (update 07:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC): now located at User:RobLa/sandbox/Charles Joseph Minard in information visualization). Oh, and I attended the Miraheze board meeting earlier today (see User:RobLa/Miraheze for what I mean by "Miraheze")
- updated 20:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
1/ My friend User:ZappoMan has started editing English Wikipedia again (see Special:Contributions/ZappoMan). He seems to have diven/dived/dove into the deep end of the pool, making a change to List of presidents of the United States who owned slaves, which was almost immediately reverted by User:Drdpw. ZappoMan then made a change to The Supersuckers, which is something that was almost immediately reverted by User:XLinkBot, which is a bot. That bot seems to be pretty busy: Special:Contributions/XLinkBot, so I'm not sure that I blame the bot. It seems to be pretty hard to become a new editor on English Wikipedia. Maybe User:AnomieBOT can help User:RobLa/Bot figure out how to make good bot edits.
- updated 02:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
2/ I "created" Draft:Charles Joseph Minard in Infographics. Actually, I just copy/pasted a big chunk of Charles Joseph Minard (the part under "Information graphics": Charles Joseph Minard#Information_graphics ). I copied https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=929366591#Information_graphics into a new article, and hit "save". It looks like a pretty good article already.
- updated: 04:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- 05:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
4/ Speaking of armies, I suppose I shouldn't overestimate the size of my journal-writing army. Napoleon really botched that one: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Charles_Joseph_Minard_in_Infographics#NapoleonInRussia>. I'm pretty sure that Minard had nothing to do with Menards....
- updated 04:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1/ I made User:RobLa/Human brain. It's not about my brain per se (though I arguably have one), but it's a copy of the lead section of the current "Human brain" article. In my not-so-humble opinion, it's way too long, and way too complicated. A lot of it needs to be moved down to the article body.
- updated 01:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
1/ Well, I think I'm going to create mw:User:RobLa/Journal too...
- updated 04:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1/ I was making a link from a different MediaWiki-based wiki to Wikipedia. Over there, it's configured to allow interwiki links to Wikipedia. I like that. I wanted to create a Help:UTC page on that wiki. We don't have a help page for UTC on Wikipedia, and (as of this writing) there's not a help page over in MediaWiki's help docs (e.g. mw:Help:UTC). Yet timestamps here on EnWiki talk pages all have UTC in them. I wanted to be able to type Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on a help page over there, but we didn't have a redirect on this wiki. Well I fix that a couple hours ago. :-D
- updated 06:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- updated 06:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
In surfing around, I found this conversation from 2009: Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles. I also decided to bust this page up to make it more readable and organized.
Potential future target for next step
- 1980s in science and technology - this article might benefit from incorporation of articles in the "1980s in x" categories for technology and science.
One thing I would like to do is figure out how to tie the portal articles into decade system (e.g. 1920s • 1950s • 1960s • 1970s • 1980s • 1990s • 2000s • 2010s, see Portal:Contents/Portals/History and events for the current list). For example, the articles listed in User:RobLa/Decade articles/1980s could be created using the same technique that I've used for for 1800s-1840s.
- Kornfield, Meryl. "Family of dead Publix worker files lawsuit alleging grocery chain stopped him from wearing a mask". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2020-11-25.
- My toot on Mastodon: "Rob Lanphier (@email@example.com)". @firstname.lastname@example.org on 2020-08-28. Retrieved 2020-08-28.
- "Menard's: Revision history", Wikipedia, retrieved 2020-08-28