User:Rojinbkht

Here are the articles I'm considering to review:

Actin remodeling of neurons: seems like there is already a lot there, maybe room for reorganization, but maybe not enough work

Lipid metabolism: definitely in need of expansion and clarification

Enzyme inhibitor: Could maybe use some clarification in places, but probably not enough work left

Peer Review

Hey Rojinbkht,

Here is my peer review for your Wikipedia page, hope it is helpful:

Clarity, easy to understand

• I think some sentences can be cleared up a little bit (I fixed some sentences here and there that missed words like “the” or “and” and changed one sentence that sounded a little weird, hope that’s ok). Keep an eye out for other sentences though. For example, “There are three sources from which the body can get fueled by fats” would sound better as “there are three ways organisms can use fats to obtain energy.” For the lipid metabolism part, I was a bit confused. You state “fatty acids are transported into the tissues and then enter the muscles.” Towards the end though you start talking about starting in epithelia cells and then beta oxidation of small intestine and I was lost still as to how they enter the muscles. It would help if in the image you also state where each step is occurring, to help readers follow allowing with the section.

Recommendations for organization, new sections or subsections, order, or location of content

• An example of a hormone that is made from the synthesis of cholesterol from acetyl-CoA would be cool, and maybe a little more expansion on the reaction of making triacylglycerols (the biosynthesis section).

Are there any terms that need definition, more information, or can be linked to other wiki pages.

• I think lipogenesis should be linked to another wiki page. Also, some abbreviated words like HDL or VLDL would be nice to have the word next to it. For example “HDL (High Density Lipoprotein)”

Is all the information relevant, not excessive, need to be on this page.  Too much repeated from other pages?

• Everything meshes well together; Like the order of how you briefly summarize everything in the beginning and then go into more depth about each step throughout the wiki page. Relevant and not excessive.

Recommendations for speaking in a scientific tone; scientifically accurate, but not too technical.

• It’s easy to read and I think the audience will be able to grasp the material (unless professor says otherwise)

How can images be improved, or what images would help clarify the page

• It would be cool (I think) to have an image for the lipid digestion part, maybe outlining the path the lipid takes throughout the body, could help visual learners better understand the content.