|This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at
My work of writing or rewriting virtually all the articles describing the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of the First World War to B-class and quite a few to GA, which began on a Bloomsday in June 2010 three and a half years ago, ended on 2 January 2014.
Let them eat cake.
I am the beneficiary of a free tertiary education. Thank you Prime Minister Whitlam. Acknowledgements and thanks also go to –
- 1963/4 to Frank and Craig for introducing me to military history via the American Civil War
- 1976 to CDLB for encouraging me to think about a tertiary education
- 1978/82 to Melbourne State College and Victoria College, Prahran for opening your doors to mature age students, and introducing me to research techniques and life-long learning
- 1985/95 to Melbourne University for the transition from electronic typewriter with a memory to computer, with training and the opportunity to develop a database, supported by their IT department
- 2002 to Vanessa and Peter for the computer on which I began this work
- 1897/1982 to my father EAS  who served during the Sinai and Palestine campaign of World War I.
- 1 Awards
- 2 Favourite moment in a film
- 3 Links
- 4 Articles created 2013
- 5 Articles reconstructed 2013
- 6 Articles created 2012
- 7 Articles created 2011
- 8 Articles created 2010
- 9 Reconstructed articles
- 10 Articles of interest
- 11 Good article criteria
- 12 Problem articles
- 13 Plans
- 14 Work pages & notes
|The Anti-Flame Barnstar|
|Because you have kept cool when you dealt with personal attacks and incivility aimed against you. Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)|
|The Original Barnstar|
|I am so impressed with your work on the Sinai/Palestine campaign. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)|
|The Original Barnstar|
|For writing the wonderful article on the Charge at Irbid :). Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)|
|The Tireless Contributor Barnstar|
|For your fantastic work and efforts with the Sinai and Palestine campaign, especially with the images! Droodkin (talk) 04:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)|
|The Military Editor's Barnstar|
|In recognition of your efforts on the Sinai-Palestine campaign. I would have liked to have done more work on these articles myself, but am pleased that they are in such good hands. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)|
|The Editor's Barnstar|
|In recognition of the herculean effort he or she has invested in First Transjordan attack on Amman (1918) so far, I am pleased to award RoslynSKP the long-overdue Editor's Barnstar. Keep it up! Cheers --Sp33dyphil © • © 07:11, 10 November 2011 (UTC)|
|The Epic Barnstar|
|Awarded to RoslynSKP, for all your hard work around the topic of the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of the First World War during 2010. Keep up the hard work! AustralianRupert (talk) 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)|
- Indefinitely prohibited from making reverts; first appeal 22:56, 23.6.14
- Indefinitely topic banned from any article relating to "Turkish military history in and predating World War One"; first appeal 22:56, 23.9.14
- Indefinitely prohibited from changing "Turkey" or "Turkish" to "Ottoman" on any article; first appeal 22:56, 23.12.14
- Banned from adding any maintenance tags until 22:56, 23.12.14.
COPY POST "ArbCom never take that into account. Consider the case of RoslynSKP, who had a better editing record and a spotlessly clean block sheet to boot, and was ideffed by ArbCom without any mention of either. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC)"
Favourite moment in a film
"I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!" Network (film)
SEE IT HERE 
- User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises up to long examples 5
- User:Tony1/Redundancy exercises: removing fluff from your writing
Thanks for the help Editor assistance at 
Australian War Memorial Reserach Centre 
- Wiki Markup 
- UKwikimedia 
- Editathon 
- Village pump Wikimedia message 
- Third opinion 
- Dispute resolution 
- Favour 
- Consensus 
- Arbit main  talk 
- Arbit evid  talk 
- Arbit work  talk 
- Arbit deci  talk 
"an edit or a series of consecutive edits what undoes other editors' actions, whether in whole or in part, counts as one revert." "Revert means any edit (or administrative action) that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material."
- Decision reached on 23 December 2013 without any analysis of the Evidence at 1.4  on the Workshop page. The basis for,  and the procedures followed by the MILHIST project,  when agreeing to change the name of the Ottoman Empire during World War I to Turkey, were not evaluated.
- Decision 
Attempted 27.12.13 revisit 28 June 2014 Could the MILHIST discussion revisit its decision  on the basis that –
a) the common name which is relevant to the choice of article name Wikipedia:Article name#Use commonly recognizable names, should not be used when naming an historical state, country or government, and
b) there is nothing in the original quote relied on to change the name of an empire, to sustain such action. The exact wording reads:
"[m]any 'Western' history books (including virtually all histories of the Gallipoli campaign) use the terms 'Ottomans' and 'Turks', and 'Ottoman Empire' and 'Turkey' as if they are interchangeable. The words may be synonymous to English-speaking peoples, but in fact they have quite specific historical meanings." [Fewster, Basarin, Basarin pp. xi-ii]
Articles created 2013
- User:RoslynSKP/Gaza school of military strategy created 29.12.13
- User:RoslynSKP/Allenby's preparations for maneuver warfare created 17.6.13
- Capture of the Wadi el Hesi moved on 17.9.13 from User:RoslynSKP/Capture of Atawineh and Hairpin redoubts created 9.7.13 need to check Falls p. 130+ 137? and Grainger/Bruce WadiHesi; moved out of userspace 3.12.13; awarded B-class 4.12.13
- Southern Palestine Offensive created 31.1.13; Wikipedia Foundation Error notice comes up everytime the article is saved, reported here  eventually fixed by the addition of [convert/q|] template but returned when article got long again; moved out of userspace 24.11.13; awarded B-class 25.11.13
- Battle of Hareira and Sheria originally created separately as Battle of Hareira on 4.3.13 and Battle of Sheria on 30.3.13 recreated on 7.6.13 moved out of userspace 15.6.13; awarded B-class 16.6.13
- The Wavell p.134 Map issue 
- Charge at Sheria created 4.4.13 moved out of userspace 2.7.13; awarded B-class 4.7.13
- Stalemate in Southern Palestine created 19.1.13 moved out of userspace 4.5.13 awarded B-class 7.5.13 submitted for Guild copy edit 25.5.13; request for ce deleted 4.6.13 due to article being taged for merge, too long, ce, and more links without discussion, and at the same time cut to pieces by two experienced anonymous editors, 126.96.36.199 (31.5.13), 188.8.131.52 neither of whom has edited any other articles, and Jim Sweeney (1-2.6.13) an appeal to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing, apart from attracting personal attacks, went nowhere,  Offensive attack made by 184.108.40.206 when adding grammar tag which this anonymous editor requires to remain on the article "until it has been copyedited."
- Visual Editor is being introduced to Wikipedia  to make it easier for new editors to work. When will Wikipedia address the other reason new editors don't stay - which they identify - HOSTILITY? Its a battlefield - see Stalemate in Southern Palestine as an example of the battle, against unhelpful editors who prefer attack and cutting, to discussing other options.
[File:AWMP0544.004AlbatrosD5.jpg] should be File:AWMP02544.004AlbatrosD5.jpg
- Raid on Nekhl created and moved out of userspace on 19.1.13; need to incorporate Falls p. 277; awarded B-class 19.1.13
- Raid on Asluj to Hafir el Auja railway created 31.12.12 moved out of userspace 2.1.13; awarded B-class 19.1.13; moved to Raid on Beersheba to Hafir el Auja railway 26.11.13
- Battle of Tel el Khuweilfe created 20.3.13; moved out of userspace 4.6.13; awarded B-class 4.6.13; submitted for Guild copyedit 15.6.13; completed 17.6.13;
Articles reconstructed 2013
- Charge at Huj see Huj rewrite 16.11.13
- Raid on the Suez Canal 2–15 January reconstructed with cited sources and moved from old Defence of Suez Canal article
- Third Battle of Gaza awarded B-class 23.5.13 submitted for Guild copyedit 25.5.13; copy edit completed on 12.8.13; ready for GAR 12.8.13; submitted for GAR 23.9.13; withdrawn from GAR 23.1.14.
Awarded Good Article
- Battle of Beersheba (1917) expanded 18.2. to 2.3.13, awarded B-class 13.5.13 submitted for Guild copyedit 25.5.13; copy edit completed on 12.8.13 see ; ready for GAR 12.8.13; submitted for GAR 1.9.13; awarded GA 4.11.13
Articles created 2012
- Force in Egypt created and moved out of userspace 15.12.12; see talk page for aspects of the article which need attention 22.12.12
- Desert Column created 14.11.12 moved out of userspace 16.11.12
- Charge at Kaukab created 26.8.12 as Actions at Kaukab and Kiswe moved to Charges at Kaukab and Kiswe on 20.9.12; moved out of userspace 23.9.12
- Charge at Kiswe created 22.9.12 moved out of userspace 24.9.12
- Charge at Irbid created 25.8.12; moved out of userspace 5.9.12
- Battle of Jisr Benat Yakub created 14.9.12 moved out of userspace 16.9.12
- Capture of Damascus (1918) created 26.3.12; moved out of userspace 4.10.12
- Charge at Khan Ayash created 3.10.10 moved out of userspace 6.10.12
- Battle of Aleppo (1918) created 19.10.12; moved out of userspace 26.10.12
- Charge at Haritan created 19.10.12; moved out of userspace 27.10.12
- Pursuit to Haritan created 14.8.12 name changed 19.10.12; moved out of userspace 30.10.12
- Capture of Jisr ed Damieh created and moved out of userspace 9.10.12 article moved by Jim Sweeney to Capture of the Damieh bridge 25.10.13, successfully moved back
- Second Battle of Amman (1918) created 6.11.12 moved out of userspace 10.11.12
Awarded Good Article
- Capture of Jenin created article 13.3.12 moved out of userspace 25.3.12; re edit finished 30.6.12; copyedit requested 1.7.12 ; copyedit complete 25.7.12 needs to be checked along with Jim Sweeney's copyedit; ok 30.8.12; copyedit in process on 6.8.13 comparing with 06:39, 20 July 2012 version copyedit complete submitted for GAR 7.8.13; awarded GA 12.10.13
- Battle of Samakh created article 21.2.12 moved out of userspace 27.3.12; re edit finished ready for copyedit 1.7.12; copyedit requested 22.7.12; guild copyedit begun 20.8.12; Jim Sweeney's copyedit continues; ok 30.8.12; double check from 14 July; double checked; submitted for GAR 3.8.13; awarded GA 22.9.13
- Third Transjordan attack created 16.4.12 - 530 views up to 1/5/12; 911 by 9/5/12 moved out of userspace 13.5.12 ; re edited up to battle 19-20 2.7.12; viewed 597 times 13/5-3/7/12; re edit complete ready for copyedit 11.7.12; ok 31.8.12; copyedit requested 7.9.12 completed 25.9.12; submitted for GAR 8.10.12 removed from GAR nominations; resubmitted for GAR 12.11.12; began 31.12.12; awarded GA 2.2.13
- Battle of Sharon (1918) created article 14.2.12 moved out of userspace 6.4.12; 1,165 views in 30 days to 1/5/12; 1,623 views in 60 days from 5/5-5/7/12; re edited finished ready for copyedit 4.7.12; copy edit requested 18.7.12; completed 19.7.12 with radically different citations; submitted for GAR 22.7.12; clean up 7.8.12; ok 30.8.12;GA review started 09:48 28.11.12 failed 11:44 28.11.12;ce following GA reviewers suggestions complete 11.12.12; resubmitted for GAR 12.12.12; awarded GA 10.1.13
- Battle of Nazareth (1918) created article 26.2.12 moved out of userspace 10.3.12; re edit finished 15.6.12; copyedit requested 25.6.12 ;copyedit complete 25.7.12 needs to be checked along with Jim Sweeney's copyedit; ok 30.8.12; submitted for GAR 30.10.12;GAR start 30.11.12; discontinued 2.12.12; awarded GA 11.12.12
- Capture of Tiberias (1918) created 12.7.12; ready for copy edit 13.7.12; ok 31.8.12; copyedit requested 7.9.12 completed 4.10.12; submitted for GAR 5.10.12;GAR start 30.11.12; awarded GA 4.12.12
- Battle of Tulkarm (1918) created article 21.2.12 moved out of userspace 27.2.12; re edit finished 3.6.12; copyedit requested 6/6/12 requested info added 12.6.12 viewed 1391 times in 90 days; resubmitted for copyedit 16.6.12; copyedit complete 28.6.12; submitted for GAR 28.6.12; awarded GA 30.7.12 ok31.8.12
- Battle of Tabsor (1918) created article 25.2.12 moved out of userspace 4.3.12; re edit finished 12.6.12; copyedit requested 16.6.12; copyedit complete 18.7.12; submitted for GAR 18.7.12; cleanup 3.8.12; ok 30.8.12 awarded GA 16.10.12
- Capture of Afulah and Beisan created article 11.3.12 moved out of userspace 16.3.12; 1,002 views from 16/3 to 1/5/12; copyedit requested 15.5.12; copyedit complete 7.7.12; submitted for GAR 8.7.12; cleanup 1.8.12; ok 30.8.12; awarded GA 6.9.12
- Battle of Nablus (1918) created 25.3.12 686 views between 8-29 April; moved out of userspace 29.4.12; submitted for copyedit 22.5.12; copyedit complete 2.6.12; submitted for GAR 5/6/12; awarded GA 6.7.12 ok 31.8.12
Articles created 2011
- Capture of Jericho (1918) created article 30.9.11 copyedit requested 10.10.11; done in November; check Anzac DONE; substantial edits in Jan and Feb 2012 need checking before submitting for GA
- Action of Tell 'Asur created article 23.10.11
- First Transjordan attack on Amman (1918) created article 4.2.11 copyedit requested 17.10.11 completed 9.11.11 ; check Anzac DONE
- First Battle of Amman (1918) created 31.10.12 moved out of userspace 5.11.12
- Second Transjordan attack on Shunet Nimrin and Es Salt (1918) created article 17.7.11 copyedit requested 22.10.11 complete 30.11.11 Needs a read to get rid of quotation marks. Second copyedit began 5.1.12 ; check Anzac DONE
- Occupation of the Jordan Valley (1918) created article 3.11.11 ; check Anzac DONE; found to be substantially cut about by Jim Sweeney etc. and reconstructed 8.1.13
Articles created 2010
- Egyptian Labour Corps created article 6.8.10 ;checked Anzac none
- Egyptian Camel Transport Corps created article 4.8.10 ;checked Anzac none
- Sinai and Palestine Campaign Anzac Mounted Division reinstated as per Mil Hist consensus; 1st (Australian) Battalion wrongly identified as taking part in the Bir el Mazar raid and claim that ICCB did not take part in the raid wrongly added because one unidentified battalion of the ICCB did take part, according to the sources quoted. Article needs to be thoroughly searched for other creative edits made over the last year or so.
Cut from the article For thousands of years Palestine, Egypt, and Syria have been the sites of wars and invasions by Egyptian, Babylonians, Assyrians, Philistines, Jews, Persians, Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Crusaders, Turks and the French commanded by Napoleon and the British. [Falls 1930 Vol. 2 p. vi]
- Battle of Romani awarded GA 9.10.11 Anzac reinstated content dispute page protected 5 to 8 December 2011  check water sources 
- Battle of Magdhaba submitted for GA review 15.11.11 failed 6.12.11 - reread add back in infantry 8.12.11; Anzac reinstated; renominated for GA 12.1.12; awarded GA 26.3.12
- Battle of Rafa ready for a copyedit ; check Anzac DONE Jim Sweeney added "Yeomanry" to the name of the 5th Mounted Brigade here  and then cut it here  rewrite complete, submitted for guild copyedit 24.9.13; copyedit complete 3.10.13 ready for GAR; submit for GAR 13.10.13; withdrawn from GAR 23.1.14
- First Battle of Gaza ; check Anzac DONE; substantially rewritten and reconstructed with cited sources; request Guild copyedit 8.10.13; copyedit completed 5.11.13; gained B-class and submitted for GAR 10.11.13; withdrawn from GAR 23.1.14
- Second Battle of Gaza ; check Anzac DONE; substantially rewritten and reconstructed with cited sources; need to check Falls Ottoman and German sources Done; comparing 09:19 20.1.13 done; Guild copyedit requested 16.10.13; copyedit complete 19.11.13
- Battle of Mughar Ridge awarded GA 14.7.11 reinstated Anzac
- Battle of Jerusalem (1917) awarded GA 15.6.11 reinstated Anzac; odd citations added needs to be checked back to May 2011
- Egyptian Expeditionary Force sources needed ; checked Anzac DONE ;
- need to add Falls September 1918 oob
- XX Corps.
10th (Irish) Division (arrived September, 1917). 53rd Division 60th (London) Division (arrived June, 1917). 74th (Yeomanry) Division (formed January, 1917, left for France, May, 1918).
- XXI Corps.
3rd (Lahore) Division (arrived April, 1918). 7th (Meerut) Division (arrived January, 1918). 52nd Division (left for France, April, 1918). 54th Division. 75th (Territorial and Indian) Division (arrived October, 1917).
The 42nd Division, which served in the desert advance, left for France early in March, 1917.
- AIR FORCE At the end of 1917 or during the summer of 1918 the Palestine Brigade, R.A.F.. was organised and the air strength was increased to these proportions :-
- 5th (Corps) Wing.
No. 14 Squadron, R.A.F. No. 113 Squadron, R.A.F. No. 142 Squadron, R.A.F.
- 40th (Army) Wing.
No. 111 Squadron, R.A F. No. 144 Squadron, R.A.F. No. 145 Squadron, R.A.F. No. 1 Squadron, A.F.C. No. 21 Balloon Company – Nos. 49, 50, and 57 Balloon Sections. [Cutlack, The Official History of the Australian Flying Corps, pp. 67–8]
- PHOTO AWM P01541.008 'Group portrait of five officers, left to right back: Lieutenant Colonel (Lt. Col) Cecil Horace Granville, 1st Light Horse Regiment; Lt Col Lachlan Chisholm Wilson, 5th Light Horse Regiment, Lt. Col. George Macbeay M. Onslow DSO (1 January 1917), 7th Light Horse Regiment. Front row Lt. Col Thomas John Todd, 10th Light Horse Regiment and Lt. Col. C.J. McDonald, Australian Army Medical Corps.'
Articles of interest
- Battle of Megiddo (1918) ; check Anzac DONE
- Desert Mounted Corps (includes Desert Column) ; checked Anzac DONE
- Henry Chauvel ; checked Anzac OK
- Anzac Mounted Division ; checked Anzac DONE
00:08 27.12.13 + 3 days
Improper use of rollback reported to Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard here  archived here  resulted in snarking then a wrap over the knuckles, followed by impinging my reputation on 30.10.13 here  while User:RoslynSKP reported by User:Jim Sweeney (Result: ) on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring here  was linked back by Anotherclown to the rollback. Requested advice from Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard "I reported an editor for an improper rollback which was dealt with. But a series of unsubstantiated posts which impinged my reputation were added. To these I added the subheading, hoping that those who had made the unsupported disparaging comments would at least apologise. There have been no steps taken to either support the comments or withdraw them. Can you advise me how this problem can be resolved? At the same time Jim Sweeney reported me for an edit war here  which has been linked back to the rollback discussion. I pointed out the weakness of the links used to support this report, but once the link back to the rollback discussion happened this issue also has remained unresolved."
but this was the wrong place. It was suggested going to RFC/U and ARBCOM but both seem to be overreach. Asked the editor who made this decision how best to proceed. The Edit warring shows a result transferred to ANI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 6.11.13
The line to this edit by me on the Administrators' noticeboard has been shadded.
- Just a minute.
- The reporting of the rollback was found to be perfectly correct and in fact the editor who made it was warned about it by Master Of Puppets. Mark Miller's spurious suggestion that I made the rollback was clearly dealt with by Master of Puppets also. See above.
- Jim Sweeney's appeal to the Administrators' noticeboard regarding the edit war has been noted as being referred to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents but has so far not made it there.
The Administrators' noticeboard incident which I received a post about on my talk page never eventuated
The number of articles which have been improved to B-class and GA which I have been associated with prove that I can and do collaborate with Wikipedia editors, all the time. So, I can't understand the attitude of the editors who have impugned me. They haven't even followed basic etiquette and have made personal attacks. These are banned on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:No personal attacks, where a personal attack is considered to be accusations about personal behaviour that lack evidence. Serious attacks, (which have been made here), need serious evidence in the form of diffs and links. All the links and diffs which have been added in this discussion don't substantiate any of the accusations. --Rskp (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The edit war occurred when Jim Sweeney fought me for the citations to the first para of the intro begun when I added sources to substantiate Anzac Mounted Division form of the name of the division here . Continued while full citations were fought over including here  and here  for all the variations of the name were removed here 
moved to Etymology [subsection which reads]
The division is variously referred to in sources as the Australian and New Zealand Mounted Division,[Falls 1930 Vol. 1 p. 156] (abbreviated to the A. & N. Z. Mounted Division),[Bou, p.150] the ANZAC Mounted Division,[ref name="army">"WWI, Sinai, Palestine and Syria". Australian Army. Retrieved 28 October 2013.] and the Anzac Mounted Division by the Australian and New Zealand histories of the campaign.[ name="Gullett5">"Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918; Volume VII – The Australian Imperial Force in Sinai and Palestine, 1914–1918 (10th edition, 1941) Contents page". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 29 October 2013.] ["The New Zealanders in Sinai and Palestine". Victoria University of Wellington Library. Retrieved 1 November 2013.] here 
I edited the article on 15 June, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 October, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 November.
- Terminology problem here  brought to
- MILHIST discussion here 
- "This is a support/oppose vote to a) remove the POV dispute tag from ANZAC Mounted Division b) continue the use of "Turkish" over "Ottoman" where context is clearly in favour of this term."
Ottoman Empire not favoured in this article by a most on MILHIST discussion who favoured colloquial term 
- despite the POV issue of the 5th Mounted Brigade being consistently in full while the light horse and mounted rifles units are inconsistently abbreviated.  not being addressed
- Requested Move 4
Requested move/dated|Anzac Mounted Division ANZAC Mounted Division → no redirect|Anzac Mounted Division – This move would bring the title in line with similar articles, for example the Australian Mounted Division and the Imperial Mounted Division. This all capitals name of the mounted division makes it unique in the Wikipedia articles describing the campaigns the division took part in.
Anzac Mounted Division is recognisable - the literature regarding the Sinai and Palestine campaign refers to the 'Anzac Mounted Division'. See Hill 1978 p. 96, Powles 1922 p. 22, Wavell 1968 p. 90 et al. Bostock served in the 3rd Light Horse Brigade; when his brigade moved to the Imperial Mounted Division, he wrote - "The Anzac Mounted Division still kept its name and was combined with the 1st and 2nd Brigades, New Zealand Mounted, and the 22nd Yeomanry. The new division was called the Imperial Mounted Division and consisted of the 3rd and 4th Light Horse Brigades and the 5th and 6th Yeomanry. We of the 3rd Brigade rather resented the change, as we lost the old name of Anzac. [Bostock, Harry P. (1982). The Great Ride: The Diary of a Light Horse Brigade Scout, World War 1. Perth: Artlook Books p.62] None of these published sources use ANZAC.
Only the Australian War Memorial web site uses the all capitals version.
The Australian Government protection of the word ANZAC here  refers to the all capitals version and the Anzac version.
It is naturally and concisely the name of the mounted division as it briefly identifies the unit rather than the potentially confusing official name of the Australian and New Zealand Mounted Division, the A. & N. Z. Mounted Division, as it appears at the top of the divisions War Diary which can be accessed here  or the A and NZ Mounted Division.
The Anzac Mounted Division precisely and unambiguously identifies the mounted division whereas the all capitals version is likely to be misunderstood as to do with the army corps which was disbanded the same year the Anzac Mounted Division was formed. The mounted division has been described as the "ANZAC division" in the article a number of times which only adds to the confusion.
Anzac Mounted Division is consistently used in all articles describing the battles and campaign the division was involved in during the Sinai and Palestine Campaign.
This is not a major move, from the redirect.Rskp (talk) 01:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- The WP:Australia consensus was to do with the military not the mounted division. The MILHIST discussions regarding the name of the mounted division can be found here  and here  --Rskp (talk) 02:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The article was originally moved from Anzac Mounted Division by Grant65 who had not edited the article before, nor since, saying (moved Anzac Mounted Division to ANZAC Mounted Division: It was always upper case (ANZAC) when the division existed; the style "Anzac" was not common during WW1. See http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/anzac/acronym/index.asp), relying on the Australian War Memorial's discussion of the acronym. --Rskp (talk) 02:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Australian Mounted Division ; checked Anzac OK
- WWI Wikimedia Australia Proposal 
- Wikimedia Australia 
- Template:Infobox military unit
- Template:Infobox military conflict
- Template:Infobox military person
see also military structure, award, test site, conflict/doc, memorial, unit/doc, person/doc
- Technology during World War I needs expanding to include Sinai and Palestine campaign
- Flare gun
- Mark I tank
- Albatros Flugzeugwerke
- No. 1 Squadron RAAF
- 42nd (East Lancashire) Division
- 52nd (Lowland) Division (United Kingdom)
- 53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division
- Military history of Australia during World War I
- Middle Eastern theatre of World War I
- British cavalry during the First World War
- Dissolution of the Ottoman Empire
- Partitioning of the Ottoman Empire
- Central Powers (Ottoman Empire) subsection
- Egyptian Revolution of 1919
- Railway to Beersheba add destruction of the railway to Auja al-Hafir in May? 1917
- The Senussi Uprising
- SMS Goeben
- Battle of Cambrai (1917) Mark IV tanks
- Horses in World War I rejects
The Second Army returned from the Italian front in May 1918 to the Ypres salient, subsequently advancing through to the Rhine during the final offensive. [Blenkinsop 1925 p. 79] Veterinary sections were tested during these advances and pursuits when their access to the railway may remain the same, resulting in conducting parties convoying sick animals over extended distances.[Blenkinsop 1925 p. 78] Among the plans made prior to the final advance were the evacuation of sick and wounded animals. Marching cases were to be sent along unfrequented road, when a series of short stages of "sick-horse halts" were arranged for the animals from each division, on their march to the reception veterinary hospital at St. Omer administered by the DDVS Second Army (formerly No. 23 Advanced Veterinary Hospital). River transport was also planned while rail was reserved for more serious cases.[Blenkinsop 1925 pp. 79–81] During the final offensive, a large proportion of the casualties suffered by the Second Army; 431 (260 fatal) from enemy shellfire and 69 (44) fatal) from bombs were "evacuated by the barges under ideal conditions for this type of cases." [Blenkinsop 1925 p. 81]
They successfully stopped a major German led Ottoman advance at the Battle of Romani and captured major Turkish strongholds at Magdhaba in August and December 1916 and at the Rafah in early 1917. Along with British infantry, they participated mounted in the First, dismounted in the Second and mounted in the Third Battles of Gaza. As a result of casualties the Anzac Mounted Division was reformed with three brigades and the Australian Mounted Division was formed about this time with three brigades. These two divisions were, along with the Yeomanry Mounted Division formed into Desert Mounted Corps and along with British infantry participated mounted and dismounted in the Battle of Mughar Ridge and dismounted in the Battle of Jerusalem (1917) towards the end of 1917. In February 1918 along with British infantry they captured Jericho and in March the Anzac Mounted Division and 60th (London) Infantry Division participated in the First Transjordan attack on Amman (1918). A month later these two divisions along with the Australian Mounted Division participated in the Second Transjordan attack on Shunet Nimrin and Es Salt across the Jordan River. The Desert Mounted Corps occupied the Jordan Valley during the summer and in mid September participated in the Battle of Megiddo (1918); the Anzac Mounted Division captured Amman (capturing 10,300 prisoners in nine days), while the Australian and Yeomanry Mounted Divisions along with the British XXth Corps participated in the main attack on Ottoman positions on the coast and north across the Plain of Sharon while the XXIst Corps fought in the Judean Hills capturing Nablus. These victories led to the capture of Damascus and Aleppo. After the armistice troopers reoccupied Gallipoli in December 1918. and New Zealand Mounted Division|accessdate=2010-04-06|publisher=University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy
Horses were also ridden by officers of the Egyptian Camel Transport Corps in Egypt and the Levant during the Sinai and Palestine Campaigns. Lieutenant Joseph McPherson describes his horse's duties and final days at El Arish in January 1917:
'In the last months Tammuz and I had many happy times and merry picnics in Sinai … Convoy conducting was a pleasure with Tammuz. He walked demurely at the head of the convoy setting the pace, carried me back to the rear in no time if a whistle was passed up that something was wrong, and whirled me to the front again like a flame of fire in a way that made the natives exclaim: Truly by the life of the Prophet this is an afreet and no horse.
When we halted he became a rigid statue. When we bivouacked he could safely be left untethered (provided there was no loose water to steal),and when our convoy route took us through a narrow pass he often carried me over the rugged, glittering heights above where we had a bird's eye view of the convoy, perhaps several miles long, winding snake–like along. And when our way took us through some recent battlefield he took me far afield on both flanks to gather loot and note strange and gruesome spectacles, without losing touch with the convoy.
The last weeks of Tammuz's life, passed at El Arish, were perhaps his happiest – as they were amongst the pleasantest his master has ever known. Neither of us cared a twopenny damn for bombs and other devices of the War which made life ten times sweeter by showing one that it is a glorious gift of the gods, of active, almost infinite enjoyment, and not a mere humdrum matter–of–course, marking time indefinitely.
The water was cold, sweet and abundant, the air like wine, rations for man and beast good and plentiful, and man and beast full of life, good temper and fun. The glittering green wadi, the River of Egypt as the Scriptures call it, flowed as it were between the clear, pure, sparkling sand of the hills, and there in the wadi, Tammuz was welcome to all sorts of green succulent luxuries, whilst his rider chattered with their Bedouin owners, and surprised them by paying for what he or his horse took, unlike their recent Turkish masters; or if that offended them, by an exchange of little presents.
It was the end or near the end of a so far perfect day. Never a cloud in the sky, but the cloudlets from the bursting shrapnel of the Archibalds [artillery] in their attempt to down the audacious Fritz. A gallop at sunrise; a swim in the sea for us both and a good lunch; a pleasant ride to the Intelligence OC and a little roaming about El Arish. A glorious ride in a wonderful sunset then rest in camp. Before turning in pleasantly tired out I saw Tammuz lying in one of his quaint attitudes of abandon, on his side with his legs stretched out. Then after wishing one another goodnight I was soon asleep and Tammuz doubtless in much the same condition.
Suddenly I was half awakened by being dragged on to the sand from my camp bed. I opened my eyes to see a new officer who was sharing my tent and who had been responsible for this manoeuvre throwing himself down at my side. At the same instant a curious pulsating whirr, very loud and very near, ended in a crash that shock the ground and almost stunned us. The tent was shaken as by a terrific wind and several holes appeared in the canvas.
A beastly near thing, that, said Lieutenant Kelly, the new officer, and there's more coming. Lie down, lie down. Rot, I replied, it's a scientific impossibility for a plane to throw two bombs on the same spot. Granted,' he expostulated, but there are a lot more than one plane over us. The camp's big enough for a score of them, I said, but realised from the crumping going on that this was the biggest bombing any of us had as yet put up with … The rain of bombs had almost ceased, but the planes swooped down from time to time and sent a hail of machine–gun bullets into the camp. However a few planes had a bomb or two left and one fell about eighty yards from us. Where did that one drop? I asked with secret misgivings. Bang in the middle of our horse lines, replied Kelly. Good God, I yelled, in the horse lines, and sprinted down to where I had left Tammuz happily asleep.
The camp was flooded with the clear light of a full moon, but here and there a smoke wraith blurred the general glory and marked where a bomb had fallen. A blacker pall hung over the horse lines and under it several fine beasts lay dead and others were in the last agonies, but the moon shone on Tammuz lying much as I had left him, but three of his legs were desperately galloping, the fourth had been almost torn away, and from the severed femoral and other arteries his life's blood was gushing. He stopped galloping as I came up and there was the same old friendly half humorous look in his dimmed eye, and then it glazed over, but as I patted his neck and rubbed his nose and talked to him, his beautiful mane seemed to shake. It may have been a transient breeze, or the gentle breath of the Angel of Death; but in any case it was the last sign of life that ever came from Tammuz.
When I returned to the tent, Kelly was very pale and was sitting on the sand doing something to his leg. I can't stop this infernal bleeding, he said, for Christ's sake, jump on old Tammuz's back and gallop for the MO. I know you don't bother about saddles.
The next day a fatigue party from my men sorrowfully dragged Tammuz's remains down to a green and flowery spot in the wadi and reverently buried him under the grass and flowers and put up a little horse shoe of wood: and under a rough representation of the sun, the symbol of Tammuz, (and a 'Crux Ansata', which concealed a secret hope for Tammuz like that of the Red Indian for his dog) I wrote (in a scroll of Scarlet Pimpernels) ...
- My day's delight is past, my horse is gone
- Erected by Lieut. McPherson in
- Memory of his Horse and Comrade, Tammuz
- Killed in Action
- 19.1.17' [B. Carman & J. McPherson eds. 1983, pp. 184–6]
Good article criteria
Good Article Review criteria for a pass or fail WP:WIAGA
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Well cited and referenced.
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated with maps and contemporary images.
"180th Infantry Brigade (in which the word "Infantry" is always omitted unless the context demands that the formation shall be distinguished from a cavalry brigade)." [Falls 1930 Vol. 2 p. xiii]
- Affair of Katia changed to Battle of Katia created article 2.7.10 awarded GA 30.8.11 change of name formally disputed on 20.11.11 after much discussion; GA award deleted because of dispute regarding the name of the article 26.11.11; GA award reinstated 27.11.11 when name of article changed
- Affair of Abu Tellul changed to Battle of Abu Tellul ready for a copyedit; change of name formally disputed after much discussion 20.11.11
techniques most often employed = ridicule, misrepresentation, and ostracism 2011
[delta] inserted 39 meaningless autogenerated citations in Battle of Jerusalem (1918) article which took over 5 hours to change back into English.
[delta] inserted 22 meaningless autogenerated citations in the Battle of Rafa article which took over an hour to find and replace with English
[delta] inserted 15 meaningless autogenerated citations in the Sinai and Palestine Campaign article which took over an hour and a half to find and replace with English.
[delta] changed the references/file names to the following photo files - reason seems to be descriptive file names preferred by some to the institution and catalogue number although descriptive titles are not mandatory.
- File:AWM photo J06585.jpg now File:Hong Kong Mountain gun battery in action (November 1917).jpg
- File:El Arish 00059v.jpg [location unknown]
- File:IWM Q12620.jpeg now File:4th Sussex Regiment marching through Bethlehem, 9 December 1917.jpeg
- File:IWM Q12647.jpeg [location unknown]
- File:IWM Q50888.jpeg [location unknown]
- File:IWmphotoQ 012379.jpg [location unknown]
During lengthy discussions with administrator DragonflySixtyseven, coordinator Dana boomer and Fastily who cut these files it has finally been established that not only [delta] was involved in the renaming, moving to commons and deletions of files 'for the good of wikipedia'. [delta's new name 'ΔT The only constant']
December to February 2012 Jim Sweeney Anotherclown time wasters - status quo for the most part reinstated
included during this time was the extended discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history Archive 108 No. 53 regarding the name of the Anzac Mounted Division which I think began on the Romani article talk page and ended with the following :
"Australian and New Zealand Mounted Division was, in practice, too cumbersome a name, so "Anzac Mounted Division" came into use. The all caps usage is muddle headed. This is the consensus of military historians and I see no reason not to follow. (Aside: I have never seen a class that knew what an "Army Corps" is.) Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)"
July a copyedit of Sharon article by Lfstevens mucked up the citations; even changing the date of one publication
Jim Sweeney resurfaced stroppy but mostly positive except changing Otto Liman von Sanders to Liman and then on the advice of another editor to Liman von Sanders.
August Jim Sweeney back to changing Anzac Mounted Division; though it appears he has seen the light regarding the names of the units used by Falls
October Jim Sweeney cuts "Populations living on the battlefields" in Sharon, Nablus and Damascus articles , ,  An edit war ensued which has had no resolution see my talk page , ,  but the Populations living on the battlefields remain on the Sharon, Nablus and Damascus articles to date. 24.11.12 and I replaced the GA symbol on the Battle of Nablus on 16.11.12 and its still there.
November Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 November 7 Some senseless redirects put out for deletion on 7 November, 
one very extended senseless discussion still going on 26 November, 
and one overtaken by Jim Sweeney  who created all three odd redirects.
Jim Sweeney added info to the Charge at Haritan from anonymous source and cut info which had got the article to B class claims brigade acted alone without divisional direction and disputes reputable historians , , claims a stalemate . This article continues to languish as a result of Jim Sweeney's edits at C-class
Powers Jim Sweeney abused from November-December 2011 to January-February 2013
and a polite question to MilHist discussion regarding Jim Sweeney's changing part of the infoboxes of 35 articles resulted in tirades from Nick-D, Anotherclown supported by Peacemaker67 and Crisco 1492 here , in Archive 115.
October 2012 to January 2013 chronic internet problems including slow response and connection interruptions continuing spasmodically
- Imperial Mounted Division
- Tel el Khuweilfe
Work pages & notes
ISBNs, the original standard (ISBN-10) is ten characters long; nine digits and a check digit which is either 0-9 or X. A few years back they converted it to ISBN-13, which is the same nine digits with 978 in front and a different check digit. The two can be automatically converted into each other, and they're functionally interchangeable. It really doesn't matter which you use; the standard is generally drifting towards 13.
Template:Convert explains that the parameter 'adj' allows you to force an adjective, e.g. "The 190-foot (58 m) bridge" as opposed to "The 190 feet..."
- autogenerated citations - Citations may be automatically created by tools, such as WP:REFLINKS.