Live spellcheck - if you see the edit summary Pseudo automatic live spellcheck: Correct spelling... it means I corrected the listed spelling. This is not a bot, and I do check each correction manually (per policy). The articles I correct are chosen by the script, and not me.
Source patrol - I've added [citation needed] to these articles recently, and if the statements aren't sourced soon, I'll remove the statements in accordance with WP:V.
Constitutional Court of Spain - there is very little about the Spanish judiciary on Wikipedia in general. I'll start with this article, and try to get it up to DYK status, and then move on to other related articles.
Right to petition - started article, mostly about US application (since that's what I'm familiar with), and, incidentally, UK historic application (only because I'm tracing the roots of the American application in the US Bill of Rights)
Bush v. Gore - for such a controversial issue, this is well-balanced article, I think it can reach FA status. I've done a bunch of improvements, but the major thing left to reach comprehensiveness is fleshing out the details of the individual justice's opinions.
These are specific examples of general trends in Wikipedia that bother me.
Only one trend for now! That's good!
Fringe opinions (and controversies about those fringe opinions, and discussions about controversies about..., etc. etc.) get more coverage and editor time than the topic itself
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that SilverStar may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SilverStar.