User talk:Spartaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Spartaz)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Spartaz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

What again?

I'm a long term user and have been an admin on or off for a decade. That makes me a bit stuck in my ways but I have the benefit of experience and working through many of the changes that have left us where we are.

A BLP is a serious matter and needs to be properly sourced.

I mostly work on deletion discussions. I am willing to userfy deleted articles for improvement as long as there is a reasonable likelihood that they can be saved.

Useful Links:

Please don't leave talkback templates as I always watchlist pages when I edit and I'm perfectly capable of looking for a reply myself.
please stay in the top three tiers


I've edited before on other wikis online about fan interests related to video games. Was more of a lurker for a while, reading and contributing here and there. Thank you, Right cite (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


You blocked Duncan079 for socking. Who is the sock master? -- RoySmith (talk) 00:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't know for sure. I just know he turned up in an afd that was vote stacked and I'm waiting for him to substantiate his claims.Spartaz Humbug! 19:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


More than seven years ago, you blocked Blueyefinity for copyright violations. They now wish to return to editing and have generally provided reasonable answers to User:Yunshui/decline copyvio questions. Your block was definitely appropriate, seven years ago. Any objection if I lift the block now? --Yamla (talk) 11:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

None at all. More than happy to trust your judgement. Spartaz Humbug! 15:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Wishing you a happy 2021! Happy holidays[edit]

Happy New Year .jpg Happy New Year!
Hello Spartaz:

Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

Hhkohh (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Azad Samaj Party‎[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azad Samaj Party (2nd nomination). The article had 17 indepedent references including few of them were added by me and 5 out of the 7 believed it was enough to pass WP:GNG. There is lot of coverage in the Hindi Language as well. Why was this closed as a Redirect when the consenus was against it , you could have closed No consenus at worst but not Redirect? Can I take this to WP:DRV.Thanks.Wish You a Happy New Year.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Actually you were asked to detail what sourcing was suitable and did not reply. Weak.assertions are not strong arguments and not substantiating your claims on request means they get little weight. Its not about headcount, its about strength of argument.
thanks for your propmt reply.I missed the ping from other user hence did not reply but I have added references to the article.Here ,Here ,Here and Here and Here.The answer to his question are the 17 references in the article the claim of notabilty is based on the references in the article . Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
All I can do is base a decision on the discussion. You were obviously following the discussion. Bare assertions are not particularly helpful. See Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Instead of saying Its notable or it passes tye gng what is missing is discussion of the source you are basing it on. In this case what sources pass gng and how do they do so?. Spartaz Humbug! 15:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

"Fuck her right in the pussy" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fuck her right in the pussy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 13#Fuck her right in the pussy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Rummskartoffel (talk • contribs) 15:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)