User:William M. Connolley/ACE2011

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Criteria[edit]

  • personal experience: I'll be judging people by how they behaved in cases I've been in.
  • availability: Iridescent may have been a nice chap but he failed in his duty to be there; he is hardly alone in this.
  • clue: arbcomm is broken, badly. Anyone who thinks all is well, or needs minor tweaks, is a No.
  • limits: arbcomm is an arbitration committee suffering badly from feature creep.
  • old guard: too many timeservers; sitting arbs will need to have been good.

Stuff I'd like to see in people' statements[edit]

  • I'd like arbcomm to think more about content and less about conduct.
  • Arbcomm is lazy. To force them to be less so, and for the good of cases, only behaviour predating the opening of a case should be considered.

Generally I tend to like NW's views (User:NuclearWarfare/ACE2011), except on BLP where he is badly wrong; read WP:BLPZEALOT instead.

User:Monty845/ACE2011 is worth a look.

My votes[edit]

User Statement & Questions Rights[1] Edits[2] Since Preliminary notes Opinion
AGK
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,CU,OS 30,521 2006-02-27 Poor clerk during WP:ARBCC [1] etc. Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Coren
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,CU,OS,Arb 16,556 2003-05-27 Poor in WP:ARBCC and didn't really recover in the appeal. Not worth giving another chance. Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Courcelles
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,CU,OS 206,036 2006-09-17 Statement is vacuous, answers uninteresting, but what finally stopped me was that he has no ideas at all for improving the committee (see "broken", above). Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


DeltaQuad
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

ex-A,OTRS 15,984 2007-11-07 Weak No. I don't know him, his answers are poor and verging on breaking several of my desires. Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Eluchil404
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A 10,768 2006-03-02 Appears to have some clue, and is new. Venturing support. Symbol support vote.svg
Support


Geni
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,OTRS 27,643 2004-03-30 Was vaguely inclined to support before reading statement and answers. But anyone with no ideas for change just isn't thinking. Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Hersfold
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,CU,OS,ex-Arb 33,277 2006-12-21 Lightweight; fails "availability" criterion. Was rubbish clerk for Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Hot_Stop
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

None 831 2011-04-11 Joke Symbol unrelated.svg
Strong Oppose


Jclemens
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,OTRS,CU,OS,Arb, 32,210 2006-08-24 Would have been a no, based on ARBCC and [2]. But [3] (a followup) is crap See-also Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2011/Candidates/Jclemens/Questions#Questions from Skinwalker Symbol unrelated.svg
Strong Oppose


Kirill_Lokshin
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,CU,OS,Arb 70,451 2005-06-08 Was crap in WP:ARBCC Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Kww
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A 55,932 2007-01-09 Statement is the best I've seen, some of the contributions look good too. Ideas for improvement are disappointing, and I've still got this nagging feeling I remember him from somewhere. I feel obliged to give someone strong support, and he just pips ST. Symbol kept vote.svg
Strong support


Panyd
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,OTRS 9,044 2007-10-13 No, with regret. User:Panyd/Mental Health is tolerable in an admin, but breaks the "availability" condition. The BD RFC isn't good [4]. No proposals for change. Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


NWA.Rep
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

None 4,289 2006-02-12 Joke Symbol unrelated.svg
Strong Oppose


SilkTork
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A 51,864 2006-01-12 New, which is good. Statement better than most, answers sane if not really what I'd like. [Update, post election. I ended up seeing [5]. The oppose is fine; the "not a serious candidate isn't". Would not have supported had I noticed before.] Symbol support vote.svg
Support


Risker
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,OTRS,CU,OS,Arb 18,805 2005-12-27 One of the authors of the risible initial PD in ARBCC [6]; need I say more? Symbol unrelated.svg
Strong Oppose


Roger_Davies
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,CU,OS,Arb 29,341 2005-09-17 Poor in WP:ARBCC and didn't really recover in the appeal. Not worth giving another chance. Symbol declined.svg
Oppose


Worm_That_Turned
 • talk • contribs
 • logs • block log
 • editcount • rights

Statement
Questions
Discussion

A,OTRS 8,905 2008-07-13 Much like ST: appears sane. The KW RFC is a point in his favour. Symbol support vote.svg
Support

Notes[edit]

  • Positions
    • Arb=Current Arbitrator
    • ex-Arb=Former Arbitrator
    • OTRS=Have access to OTRS for purposes other than checkuser or oversight
  • Admin-level-or-higher rights
  • "None" refers to no admin-level-or-high rights
  1. ^ I imagine the OTRS part of this, at the very least, is incomplete. Assistance in filling in out would be much appreciated.
  2. ^ Reflects edits only from the account that the user is running with

See also[edit]