User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Pedro.Rodrigues.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-82392-9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- ~2025-41251-21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – User repeatedly removes correct geographic references from content insisting on other conventions that are inappropriate for the article. The user further attempts nasty insults and personal attacks on other editors on the talk page. (S)he has done so in the past under another IP user, but claims to be different. It is unlikely that this will stop in the short term. kbrose (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- MooGrob668 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. LTA of BlueDiamond20s. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙶𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝙴𝚙𝚒𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢👁👄👁 (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thespamkid (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Malte 67rizzgod (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "rizz" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Gpoop3432 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Helolololo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Assamspecialist (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)- This username matched "specialist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Used by Indian love magic spammers -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Eeveeandsylveonlover678910 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yoyoitsmethemanthemyththelegend (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Fidelioioio (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: l+o+l+o+l. Violating string: fldellololo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Shitsuma100A (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Himdeveloper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "(admin|coordinator|bureaucrat|check *user|developer|moderator|oversight|steward|sysop|committee|staff)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note on file Name may imply a position of authority -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- StoopKidsAfraidToLeaveHisStoop (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Skyofficial02 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stella.taylors.version.13 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MangoDestroyer67 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "destroy" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Urmommaa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TinyCamelLookingForLargeNeedle (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WSI Digital Team (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- F*cknaround1408 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Poopoomuncher1200 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- MASSIVE67SKIBIDI (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 11:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Masta Baiter (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 15:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Stjamessrva (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Appears to represent St. James's Episcopal Church, located in Richmond, Virginia (VA). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 16:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pmsckaushalya (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Could be a sockpuppet of User:Karlind Govender. Appears to be resubmitting AfC draft exactly the same. See Draft:Patric Tariq Mellet and User:Pmsckaushalya/sandbox. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Brotherhood Of Eternal Love Merry Pranksters (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. COI edits to The Brotherhood of Eternal Love are the account's only edits. Gommeh (talk! sign!) 21:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent increase in unsourced content additions and vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 08:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Arcticocean ■ 19:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection High level of IP vandalism today. Jeppiz (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
User blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Unprotected and immediately back to vandalism jolielover♥talk 12:52, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple TAs have attempted to change the infobox to say that production of the Model S has ended. While Tesla has announced that Model S production will end in 2026, sources have not confirmed that this has happened yet. ZLEA TǀC 14:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Constant back and forth WP:DERRY issues by a variety of TAs. FDW777 (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Unconfirmed rumors being added YKProd (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Too much vandalism, sockpuppetry and disruptive editing from this userpage, we've tried edit filters, but failed. Please protect this page as it is necessary. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙶𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝙴𝚙𝚒𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢👁👄👁 (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from anonyous users by changing logos without explanation. Same happens to template for said network as well. MrRingtail (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple TA's redirecting the article without good reason. Sugar Tax (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism despite quite a few protections, some long-term, over the past nine years. Entranced98 (talk) 16:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Also as Du Chun persistent disruptive editing of multiple TA's redirecting this article without discussion and good reason. Zhongli9078 (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing from auto-confirmed accounts, including sockpuppetry. Nothing good can come from reducing ECP down to auto-confirmed or lower. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:49, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism + addition of unsourced material. 180,000 views yesterday alone so I doubt it will stop. EF5 17:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙶𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝙴𝚙𝚒𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢👁👄👁 (talk) 17:54, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Epstein disruption. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 18:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has recently been receiving regular vandalism from temporary and new accounts. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 18:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Highly vandalized following it's popularization in 2025 by TikTok and YouTube Shorts as a "meme". Jejuaviator (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Sugar Tax (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: IPs continue to add a non notable nickname that was given to him as a joke during Super Bowl media interviews this week. I am hoping to get the page protected until at least after the Super Bowl on Sunday to see if that slows down the IPs. -- ZooBlazer 19:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left guide (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP adding inadequately sourced content and not responding to multiple editors explaining why this is a problem. Marquardtika (talk) 19:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Marquardtika: If it's just this one user, go to WP:AIV or WP:ANI in the future. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I asked an admin who was active on this issue and they recommended coming here FWIW. Marquardtika (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Reason: Jeremiah Justin Simms, also known as Wifiskeleton, has an article that was accepted through Articles for Creation, demonstrating notability. The Wifiskeleton page has been protected under WP:SALT due to repeated page recreations. It is recommended that the page be unprotected and unsalted, and that the article for Jeremiah Justin Simms be moved to Wifiskeleton. Monkegamer123 (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Pppery as protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I am seriously not impressed by the WP:GAMENAMEing here. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I've nominated for speedy deletion under G4. If that's declined I intend to take to AfD * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I am seriously not impressed by the WP:GAMENAMEing here. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Unprotection: @MSGJ: @Black Kite: Subject to two AfD nominations, and fully protected in 2009 afterwards. The protection was changed to Extended Confirmed in 2017, but there have been almost no edits since the 2000s so it isn't needed at all. NewAccount7295 (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC) |
| 5 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for accountcreator |
|---|
Account creator[edit]
I have hit the rate limit at WP:ACC numerous times. I have had this right before during my first stint with ACC. --Seawolf35 T--C 15:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
@Cypp0847 has authored 198 articles, of which only 2 have been deleted. One of these was for WP:SYNTH, the AfD having taken place during October 2022. They primarily translate articles from the Chinese Wikipedia, recent examples contain no issues that require action by an NPR. I reviewed Ma Tau Wai Road building collapse and found no issues, other than adding the translation banner to the talk page. Chinese sources vary in reliability, but based on the articles I have reviewed from @Cypp0847, the sourcing appears consistent and without issue. BLPs such as John Clancey are well sourced and do not leave any information uncited. A recent AfD of their article John MacLennan resulted in a unanimous keep. Their talk page is mostly filled with automated messages regarding images, with little after April 2025. Based on what I've seen from @Cypp0847, I am quite confident the 2022 AfD SYNTH concerns were an anomaly, and doesn't appear to have been an ongoing issue, with no reoccurrences since. Thank you for your contributions and translations, @Cypp0847! 11WB (talk) 10:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
I came across Javajourney while reviewing new pages and was impressed with their clean pages on music subjects. They have created 106 undeleted mainspace pages since late 2024. (There are three deleted articles, all from early on in their Wikipedia career, plus a recently deleted inadvertently created redirect. A number of articles created in 2024 were redirected or merged at AfD, and Javajourney appears to have taken Bastun's advice to bone up on notability to heart.) I reviewed the last 10 created pages in depth. Notability is always clearly demonstrated, whether through chart performance, reviews or some other WP:NMUSIC criterion. (NMUSIC is one of the harder SNGs to master and Javajourney appears to understand how to strongly demonstrate notability for the benefit of a reviewer.) Pages are all highly presentable, NPOV is maintained, and talk pages are created. Sourcing is strong and primary sources are used appropriately (e.g. for chart performance). At the pace Javajourney is creating new articles, granting them autopatrolled will reduce the queue for reviewers without compromising on the quality of the encyclopedia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting autopatrolled rights as I have recently reached the 25-article milestone on the English Wikipedia, primarily focusing on Moroccan public institutions and strategic infrastructure (e.g., ADA, ANP, and ANEP). My contributions are well-sourced, categorized, and inter-connected via a navigation template (Template:Public institutions of Morocco) and a central list (List of government agencies of Morocco). Recently, I've been performing maintenance tasks such as adding to biographies and managing talk page banners. I aim to reduce the burden on New Page Reviewers as I continue to document the Moroccan institutional landscape. Thank you for your time. Mohamed Filali (talk) 09:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I think i potentially need Autopatrolled rights to do contributions on Astronomy and Spaceflight parts of Wikipedia Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I want to use AWB to fix stuff like Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images or stray markup, which can be annoying to do by hand as you have to click each page, edit it manually and save it. Laura240406 (talk) 11:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Short descriptions & AWBTASKS, will only use JWB due to Mac HKLionel TALK 09:07, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting AWB/JWB access to assist with the maintenance and standardization of articles related to Moroccan institutions, governance, and infrastructure. Over the past few days, I have created several high-quality articles (e.g., ONSSA, ADD, and several Moroccan Ministries). I have noticed many related pages require repetitive cleanup tasks, such as fixing internal links, standardizing infoboxes, and adding relevant portals like {{Portal}}. While I am currently approaching 150 manual edits, my contributions consist of significant article creations and major expansions. Access to JWB would allow me to handle these routine tasks more efficiently. I am familiar with AWB policies and will use the tool responsibly. Mohamed Filali (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
I would like this to help combat vandalism, and clean up typos. I am quite active anti-vandalism wise, and have experience with correcting grammar on Wikipedia with the syntax and find-and-replace features it provides. It would be helpful to reverse or edit multiple articles that have been vandalized quickly as to minimize the time spent, and to search for and fix typos in a fast and timely manner. It could also be helpful to expand the article list of fires. pHLOGISTON eNTHUSIAST (tALK pAGE) 17:50, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Hi. I'm requesting AutoWikiBrowser so I can fix some broken links on articles, because checking back to see which ones are dead, are quite annoying and make my hand tired, also wanting to do tasks quickly- to improve articles as fast as I can, and fixing up messy grammar and typos, and finally finding articles that need improvement. I'm also commonly active on the recent changes and abuse log, so I can catch vandals and unhelpful contributions, and reverting bad faith edits would be faster with AWB. Thanks! ♠GreatestPolskaHamster (hamster chat!) 00:41, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I'm requesting JWB in order to add categories to articles, on the basis of referenced statements present in Wikidata, where I am mainly active (and admin); in the last weeks I have already been using JWB for the same action in it.wikipedia (cf.), where I am also admin, and in es.wikipedia (cf.). Thanks very much! --Epìdosis 17:33, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
I would like to use the JS Wiki Browser to enhance my overall editing experience and make tedious tasks easier.
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I would like to become a reviewer because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia, making constructive edits, and I am familiar with the site’s guidelines and policies. I want to help maintain article quality and assist in patrolling new pages to prevent vandalism and ensure accurate information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zirio456 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit]
I am a member of WP:WikiProject Women in Red and have been involved in organising our regular monthly events for some time. Each month a message goes out to members on the distribution list (see e.g. the February message). We have a couple of people who send these mass messages at the moment and a call has been put out for more volunteers. I would like to help out. I've read the guidance for use, and Lajmmoore has kindly offered to provide support, including coaching me through my first message. Many thanks, Chocmilk03 (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Hi HJ Mitchell, you have denied my earlier probational request by this. After your statement, I have worked hard in WP:AFD and have rescued many articles with substantial sourcing. I have strong beliefs in my reasoning that my AfD participation have been gone through hard working and source findings. Can you please review me again? SatnaamIN (talk) 08:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
I have been editing the English Wikipedia for about 9 years now and active train new editors as a member of the Wikimedia Ghana User Group. I believe I have gained confidence in patrolling and engaging on various conversation onwiki so with this right I will be able to do more. Owula kpakpo (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights again. This is my second request, and I would like to return to reviewing articles that need work. I have experience working at AfD last year and currently making articles. I have created and expanded several articles and through this work, have become familiar with notability requirements (especially the importance of notable sources) and BLP policy. I would like to help out further by reviewing new pages. AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 04:19, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights to assist in improving the quality of new articles, particularly those related to the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Although my edit count is currently around 412, I have been an active member of the Wikipedia community for 4 years (account created in 2022). I have a solid understanding of notability guidelines (WP:N) and BLP policies, as recently demonstrated in my cleanup and sourcing of Mohamed Métalsi and List of government agencies of Morocco. My request follows a suggestion from 11WB during my autopatrolled application, who noted that my maintenance work aligns well with NPR tasks. I am committed to maintaining high standards and reducing the backlog in the New Page Review process. Thank you for your consideration. Mohamed Filali (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to help address the NPP backlog. I've been a pending changes reviewer for some time, but the backlog there is typically very low. Coining (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I do a lot of NPP and often draftify unsuitable articles which leaves redirects behind. I am requesting this perm because it would help me handle these routine moves more cleanly and avoid redirect clutter. I understand WP:MOVE and WP:RM. Regards. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 22:53, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Renewing my rights, I need page moving for AFC work Olliefant (she/her) 19:43, 4 February 2026 (UTC) Olliefant (she/her) 19:43, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
My general wheelhouse has long been pages within WP:WPRS and WP:TVS. For those unfamiliar with WP:NCBC, and in particular with television and radio stations in the United States, the articles are determined by the station's call sign, with or without necessary disambiguators. Call signs (in effect, the title of the article) can change, and one thing that now occurs are "call sign swaps" where two stations will automatically exchange call signs at the same time. I had previously been relying on Sammi Brie to do the needed moves, but such swaps are now occurring with greater frequency to the point where having the permissions myself is now a necessity. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 21:01, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
AI cleanup work often involves draftifying a lot of AI-generated articles, being able to move without leaving redirect would cut down on my workload. Athanelar (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Aakashnavindu (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Good day, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights as I regularly clear vandalism and warn users appropriately, and ensure edits meet Wikipedia's sourcing standards. I have been using Ultraviolet/RedWarn to do so, and would like Pending changes reviewer rights to help review edits on vandalism-prone pages. Thank you for your time and consideration. Aakashnavindu (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm a regular recent changes and abuse log monitor who actively reverts unconstructive edits, and I think it would be nice to have this right to be able to fight vandalism more efficiently. I have been editing for about half an year, have ~1,500 edits, and have read WP:RPC and WP:PC. I also have some prior experience with Pending Changes from WP:RCP. Thank you for your consideration. Seanwk :) (Talk | Contribs) 23:23, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I am requesting the rollback right mainly to gain access to tools such as AntiVandal and Huggle so that I can revert vandalism much faster. I have been patrolling recent changes for about 6 months and almost all of my mainspace edits are antivandalism or recent changes related. Thank you.
I've been a NPP, AfC, and pending changes reviewer for some time, and feel that I can help combat vandalism and other unhelpful edits more effectively with the rollback user right. Jcgaylor (talk) 05:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Through 3O, AfD, and WikiProjects, I now monitor a large number of articles that are subject to edits that are not necessarily vandalism, but are nevertheless inappropriate. Some impact the neutrality of the article. Others lack sources or are AI-created. Some are vandalism. If it is a sourcing issue, I always look for sources before reverting. However, I keep coming across a series of edits where the entire lot has to be reverted. I frequently find myself waiting for another editor to solve the issue. Since I am on Wikipedia daily and am an experienced editor, I believe I am a good candidate for rollback permission. Rublamb (talk) 13:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
I would like rollback to fight vandalism more efficiently using AntiVandal. I have more than 500 mainspace edits, and I know how it works as I have used Ultraviolet and VandalHandle which have a very similar one-click revert mechanic. I have more than 2 months experience patrolling RC, I consistently notify editors when reverting vandalism, and I do not have any history of edit warring. SuperCode111 (talk) 23:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
I have been a pending changes reviewer since the last month, and have patrolled pending changes, and occasionally recent changes. I warn and give notices to IP users/vandals using Twinkle, and also use Ultraviolet to report vandals to AIV. I'm asking for rollback to access Huggle and combat vandalism more effectively. Swoonfed (Ping) 14:28, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights to help fight vandalism more efficiently. I have been active for 4 years and recently reached 500+ mainspace edits. I have experience in patrolling new pages and dealing with blanking and promotional content (e.g., my recent action on Karuthal (2026 film)). I am familiar with the WP:ROLLBACK policy and understand that this tool is only for blatant vandalism. This right will help me revert disruptive edits faster while I continue my work on the Morocco project. Thank you. Mohamed Filali (talk) 13:23, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Hi! I'm requesting an extension to my currently-granted template editor rights, as I'm about a week out from my trial expiring. My original request was made here and granted at Special:PermaLink/1323646684#User:MikeVitale as a trial until the end of January. During this time, I've had User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable open as a tab, and used it to find and fulfill multiple template edit requests from other editors. Pinging @User:Sohom_Datta who granted my initial trial. MikeVitale 00:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer[edit]
I often am part of anti-vandalism patrolling. Sometimes, I notice very similar edits in succession after a temporary account is blocked, often the same user. As such, TAIV would be helpful to see if this information is true or not for a given user and if they are using multiple TAs for socking. I understand the terms to gaining/losing this permission and agree to use the permission solely for constructive purposes and to abide by the WMF's rules regarding this permission. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 19:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC) thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 19:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I am requesting these permissions to support my involvement in anti-vandalism patrolling. I currently monitor the recent changes log for any vandalism attempts and am a member of the Counter Vandalism Unit. This tool would help me spot vandalism patterns and attempts that require further research more quickly, therefore expanding my capabilities. Here are some recent examples of quickly reverted vandalism attempts:
|
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 54 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 45 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 6 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 877 |
| Templates for deletion | 366 |
| Categories for deletion | 598 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 65 |
| All redirects for discussion | 553 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 17 |
| Possible copyright violations | 12 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 381 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 14 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 19 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 436 |
| Unknown copyright status | 17 |
| Unknown source | 13 |
| No non-free use rationale | 0 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 12 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 6 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,279 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 460 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,132 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,069 | 0.48 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,447 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,323 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 43,807 | 0.61 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 12,070 | 0.17 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 569,331 | 7.98 |
| All articles lacking sources | 38,584 | 0.54 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 50 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 518,918 | 7.27 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,904 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 108,503 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 346,748 | 4.86 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 145 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 16 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles proposed for merging | 690 | 0.01 |
| All articles proposed for splitting | 864 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
| Stub categories | 21,416 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 244 | 0 |
| All orphaned articles | 55,924 | 0.78 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 1,667 | 0.02 |
| All articles with style issues | 20,000 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,630 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,963 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 468 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 2,485 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,671 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 20 |
| All articles to be expanded | 52,553 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||