i think knowledge is like clean water and must flow, otherwise it gets murky or evaporates. i contribute, when i consider the topic has public importance and when i know more than what an existing wiki article states.
continue hunting "the proliferation of nominalizations [which] in a discursive formation may be an indication of a tendency toward pomposity and abstraction." (as per zombie nouns NY Times, Helen Sword, July 23, 2012)
(talk page stalker) some e-mail providers, including Yahoo and Gmail I believe, refuse to forward messages originating from other servers—including Wikimedia’s—as suspicious. There was some discussion at VPT last year, here for example. In case this is the obstacle you’re facing, the only workaround I know of is to put an address from a different service in your Preferences, at least temporarily, assuming you have access to an alternative.—Odysseus1479 04:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
You may be new, but at the root, you're trying to improve Wikiedia and educate other editors. Keep up the good work. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
For generally being an excellent editor, systematically cleaning up articles here and there throughout the encyclopedia where the articles need help. Keep up the great and continuous work! May it continue to be joyous work! Sadads (talk) 04:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar
I said it all above, but there is nothing wrong with saying it twice - plus you are pretty good at removing superfluous content so that there is room on the servers for this award. Bfpagelet's talk... 11:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)