User talk:Xavexgoem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Xavexgoem)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

archive 1 (sep 07 – jun 08) archive 2 (jun 08 – aug 08) archive 3 (aug 08 – nov 08) archive 4 (nov 08 – feb 09)
archive 5 (feb 09 – jun 09) archive 6 (jun 09 – mar 10) archive 7 (mar 10 – feb 12) archive 8 (feb 12 – feb 14)
PrefixIndex - ArticleSandbox

I've just replied to you on 'Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Geordie.23Mostly_unsourced_In_popular_culture_section'[edit]

Thank you for the comment btw.Easeswily (talk) 02:53, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Sure thing :) Xavexgoem (talk) 03:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Persian People Dispute[edit]

I think that I would have done the same thing, closing the case as a conduct dispute. The allegations by the filing party are serious and disruptive. I don't know if they are true, because I haven't researched the talk page. However, if they are true,the conduct issues by the other party are not consistent with mediation. If they are false, then claiming that they are true is a serious conduct issue also. Someone is misbehaving. Either way, I think you were right in closing the case. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

holy s***[edit]

Holy crap, since when are you back on Wikipedia? I thought I’d never see you back! Steven Crossin 19:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

I was bored. I could literally be gone by next Tuesday. We'll see! Xavexgoem (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Likewise, I only popped back in because I saw someone working on an article and I got a talk page notice about it...but now that you're back, well, that changes things! See you over at DRN. Steven Crossin 01:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Al-Ahbash Dispute[edit]

Your handling of the dispute with a Socratic examination of the filing party was unorthodox, but it worked. Were you trying to get the filing party to acknowledge that they were just being stubborn? Robert McClenon (talk) 23:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Partly, but that's like blood from a stone. I mostly wanted to know whether they cared about what other editors were telling them which would imply some measure of AGF. There might have been a case if they did, but I wasn't counting on it. (edit) But yeah, that first question I asked? Totally. I've been toying with the idea of getting some editors out of a COI/SPA/POV/Whatever mindset. Xavexgoem (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)