User talk:Handicapper

Hey

Welcome back. Good to see you participating again. I was going to whitelist you (with JVbot a month ago, but then I saw that you'd left the project, so I figured there was no point.

Since you've come back, I have added you to the bot's whitelist. DS (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

It's about newpage patrol. New articles get vetted by human eyes (or, at least, that's the intended outcome - we've got quite a huge backlog) to make sure that they're valid and not crap/lies/copyvio/spam/etc; once an article has been examined, the software removes the "has not yet been patrolled" tag. Some people (such as yourself) consistently create large quantities of valid articles; a bot has been created which automatically patrols all articles created by those people. To this end, the bot uses a whitelist. DS (talk) 13:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

---

Sixty Sails

The Info you requested is posted on my talk page.--Craiglduncan (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Douglas F. O'Neill

The article Douglas F. O'Neill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles about living persons that is unsourced should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion per WP:BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onthegogo (talk) 00:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Douglas F. O'Neill

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Douglas F. O'Neill. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas F. O'Neill. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Warning: Do not remove AFD notice on the Douglas F. O'Neill article

Do not remove the AFD notice as you did here [1]. This notice must remain in place until the AFD has concluded. Onthegogo (talk) 20:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Final Warning Re: Douglas F. O'Neill

The article Douglas F. O'Neill is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Do not remove AFD Notice from the article as you did here [2] and here [3]; and do not empty the ADF disccusion page as you did here [4] And here [5]. Onthegogo (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2010 (UTC)