The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:
- Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
- 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
- Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
- Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.
Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.
So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Can you please tell me how you made that random image selector on your userpage. It is super cool! Thanks. --NikolaiHo☎️ 04:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevemegan (talk • contribs) 21:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I left a question about the bot on the bot's talk page. It redirected here, so I wasn't sure of protocol. I assume you'll see it in either case, but erring on the side of caution, I'm notifying you here as well. Thank you. Joefromrandb (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that you had archived the most recent content from the GEO Group article's Talk Page, though it was only about four hours old and the page was not extensive. Looking at the history, you've done that seven times before. Each time, though I doubt if the content had anything to do with it, it had coincidentally moved one tendentious editor's chronic tirades from current visitors' view. I don't imagine any sinister purpose, but wondered how the bot or whatever became engaged. Can you enlighten me? Thanks. Activist (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)