User talk:- tSR - Nth Man

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Hello, - tSR - Nth Man, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Lisatwo (talk) 16:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

|type= in the Canada banner?[edit]

tSR, I don't know the last time you've been to {{WikiProject Canada}}, but there is no type parameter. I've just found out that St. John's has been added with |stjohns=yes. Thanks, Argolin (talk) 09:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

What is this in reference to? I don't remember ever using |type. - tSR - Nth Man (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Appologies. I think I was looking at the edit summaries wrong here. Was it the user after you that used type? I thought it was odd as you're Canadian. Argolin (talk) 22:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, it looks like |type= was there before I added Alberta and Nova Scotia to the banner. Not sure if this will work for you, but here's the code previous to me touching it: [1] No need for apologies; I don't take this stuff too seriously. :P Cheers. - tSR - Nth Man (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again. I've just figured out how to do it. Argolin (talk) 00:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Juno Award[edit]

I've posted a follow-up comment to yours. Please reply there. Thanks... Argolin (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

The/the straw poll[edit]

Unfortunately, there is a straw poll taking place here about the use of the/The in a band's name. Your input would be much appreciated.--andreasegde (talk) 11:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Beatles mediation[edit]

Hello there, and thank you for your email statement about the Beatles mediation. Feezo and I will shortly be outlining how we will proceed with mediation, but in the meantime I noticed that you haven't indicated your agreement to mediation on the mediation request page. Would you mind leaving a note in this section to let everyone else know that you will be participating? Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 15:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

The almost verdict[edit]

The jury is almost out.--andreasegde (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Last lap[edit]

You're turning the last bend, and it's the last lap. The mediators have asked for your comments in the "Your response" section, at the bottom.--andreasegde (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

The Band/Clapton[edit]

The Band collaborated with Clapton on his No Reason to Cry album, and Clapton played on The Last Waltz, The Band's Jubilation album, and with the group at their induction to the R&R Hall of Fame. The Wookieepedian (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

The Beatles poll[edit]

Hello — this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. Jburlinson (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Discussion about Newyorkbrad's closure of Beatles RfC[edit]

Hello. This is to let you know that there is currently a discussion at User talk:Mr. Stradivarius#RfC closure questions about Newyorkbrad's closure of the RfC about whether to use upper-case "The" or lowercase "the" in mid-sentence in articles about (t/T)he Beatles. You are receiving this message because you were involved in the mediation case that led up to the RfC. Some editors have expressed dissatisfaction with the caveat in Newyorkbrad's close that "[t]he suggestion that editors should try to structure sentences to avoid unnecessary mid-sentence use of "the Beatles" remains a valid one", and the discussion is focused on how that caveat is affecting the editing decisions in Beatles-related articles. There is also the opportunity to discuss other aspects of the close should the need arise. Please see the points at the top of the discussion thread and leave a comment if you think it is appropriate. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 13:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Conan Dark Horse[edit]

I would ask for your input and opinion on a discussion at Talk:Conan (Dark Horse Comics) that you started a few months ago. Thank you. Plastelin (talk) 21:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John Tielli for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Tielli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tielli (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.