User talk:Lightsout/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive 1 Archive 2

Orphaned non-free image File:Stan Walker - Choose You.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stan Walker - Choose You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 07:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Amy Meredith article

Hi, I really need your help with the article, Amy Meredith. It seems that an IP user has changed everything I have worked hard on fixing the article, by removing the references I've provided, changing the sections I worked hard on (music career, tours, lead section) and I was trying to undo the IP user's revisions but it won't let me. Do you think you can do that for me? to the third last revision I contributed to in it's history. User:Ozurbanmusic (talk) +

I warned them (using WP:Twinkle) and reverted to what seemed to be the latest version before content was removed - if I picked the wrong one, feel free to fix it. Hopefully they will stop now, but if they don't, you can warn them with {{Subst:uw-delete2}} and if again needed, {{Subst:uw-delete3}}. Just to warn you, you should be careful not to violate the three-revert rule yourself even though you're not vandalizing. Hope that helps! ~ QwerpQwertus · Contact Me  · 20:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much. You were a great help! ozzyg (talk) I really don't know much about this site but what I do know is that the information that I changed was correct, So I guess you need to Google, Bing, otr Yahoo because she is married and that is her new last name, but thanks alot for your time but I know what I'm doing... —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoeNic09 (talkcontribs) 13:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DEVASTATED-72dpi1 (2).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DEVASTATED-72dpi1 (2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
  3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hi there, you seem to have taken personal ownership over the Amy Meredith page. Just a reminder that this is supposed to be a collaborative effort. Personally I agree with the person who removed a great deal of the fluff you have added to it - the article should remain consise but you have filled it with duplicate material and are referencing fan pages. Futhermore, you should be making use of the article's discussion page. You are making wholesale changes and treating the page as your own.

Rowland

Hello, i reverted your edit for a couple or reasons. One, please read WP:LEAD, in music articles references are never to be mentioned in the lead of the article. This is because there should be nothing in the lead that isnt mentioned in the article so there is no need for refs in the lead. Two, this information is already mentioned in the article under Kelly_Rowland_(album)#Promotion_and_release and its premature to add it to the lead until the actual title is confirmed. Thank you for discussing this first rather then just reverting my revert. If you have any questions comments or concerns please feel free to ask. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

No worries. Thats what i thought, also im going to remove your comments from User:Lil-unique1's talk page as he is currently on vacation until the 25th and ive been asked to monitor and respond to all concerns. Kelly Rowland isnt normally an article i edit ive just been asked to watch it while he is away. Have a nice day/evening and happy editing. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Am8er

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Am8er requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cindamuse (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Am8er

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Am8er, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Am8er. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cindamuse (talk) 22:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Information.svg Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Am8er, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. The Articles for Discussion (AfD) is noted on the deletion tag. This process involves a discussion between various editors on Wikipedia. This tag must remain in place, until the discussion has been resolved. An administrator will review the recommendations and act accordingly. At that point, s/he will remove the tag. The issues with this article involve establishing notability. Articles of singers are required to meet inclusion criteria found at WP:MUSICBIO. The subject of this article fails to meet notability standards appropriate for an encyclopedia. Cindamuse (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Guy Sebastian - Gimme Some Lovin' (Live).OGG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Guy Sebastian - Gimme Some Lovin' (Live).OGG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Succession boxes

Hi, there is a ongoing discussion at WT:CHARTS#Succession boxes regarding the removal of succession boxes from articles for songs and albums that went to #1. General opinion so far is against them, but it would be good to have input from those who favor them, such as yourself. To reach a consensus, your input is valued and encouraged. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 11:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

There is no policy or guideline that says succession boxes should be there, so if you don't like them, all you have to do is accept my change, instead of saying they should stay it has been agreed upon. No one decided they should be there except that editors started to add them in because other articles were doing it. That is often how consensus is reached, by not doing anything. I do not see how they add anything to an article. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Breaking Point (song)

Note that the category Category:Keri Hilson songs is a subcategory to Category:Rhythm and blues songs, thus Breaking Point (song) does not need to be categorized in the R&B songs category as well. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I didn't notice. ozurbanmusic (talk) 00:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Been Waiting for the director?

"Been Waiting" video director is Keir McFarlane (same as for "Burn") and Mark Pugh. Look quickly at Jessica Mauboy - Been Waiting (Behind The Scenes) on YouTube at about 1:12. A clapper-board shows names! I'll let you sort out the reffing.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

According to Zane Karmat (the clapper loader), Keir is the video director and Mark is the director of photography. See here for details.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Just Keir as director for "Been Waiting" video. Meanwhile Edquist is vid dir for "Running Back" see here for a ref.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Freelancers is an independent promotion group see here for their blurb. As far as I can tell they have no direct relationship with Mauboy except for being hired for that video and "Wiggle It" for Ricki-Lee (also dir by Edquist). If you don't like it, there's another source here. Vevo is partly run by Sony.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Kelly Rowland (album)

Per WP:ALBUMS it is incorrect to add (US) etc. to the infobox. And regardless of what Kelly says about "Rose Colored Glasses" and "Grown Woman" not being released internationally they were. Either way whether you accept the latter or not it is never acceptable to add notes like that to the infobox. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Because there is an established rule that notes are not allowed in the infobox. ((see release history) is an exception) It is not allowed because it clutters the infobox and reads incorrectly with screen reader software per WP:ACCESS. Per WP:Other stuff exists just because I Am... Sasha Fierce incorrectly uses infobox notes that doesn't mean they're correct. I could just pick out an album like The Fame Monster and say that doesn't use notes. Is there a note field in the infobox? No, because it has long been established that they use of such would be incorrect. You're notion that only songs released as singles chart is delusional and incorrect. Speechless (Lady Gaga song) is not a single yet it charted around the world. What sources do you have to prove that "Grown Woman" and "Rose Colored Glasses" are not playing on international radios? We only have a source saying they were added to US radio therefore claiming they are not released internationally cus they're not on radios based on the US sources is WP:OR. The articles for the album and each of the singles are incredibly detailed and so it is NOT required to specify whether the singles were only released in the US or not. And anyway its still wrong because they were released in both the US and Canada. It says the earliest release date of the song goes in the infobox not the radio date. Whether you like it or not the songs were released internationally. See the discussion here which clarifies that for US-only singles the radio date suffices yet when a purchase date is available only the earliest release date (regardless of country) goes in the infobox. What you are suggesting currently has no support on wikipedia. it is not permitted under any of the current standards, no GA or FA albums have it and those are the best measure of standards. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Guy Sebastian

Hi, you undid my revision with the edit summary saying it's standard for the personal life section to be at the bottom, take a look at Miley Cyrus and you'll see that the Personal Life section is the third section. Personal Life generally comes after Early Life. Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм Champagne? • 2:27pm • 03:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Also when you undid my revision you got rid of a bit of information. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм Champagne? • 2:32pm • 03:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

The IP's revision was not vandalism, it was a live television slip-up and I'll find the relevant source for it. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм Champagne? • 2:33pm • 03:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

"Homesick"

I have created a userspace draft of "Homesick" - feel free to add to it. We can publish it in mainspace when it charts (and meets WP:NSONGS). It's currently at number 34 on iTunes over here, so it should chart this week. :) Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Beyonce's InfoBox Picture

I didn't like the current picture that was in the InfoBox for the Beyonce article. And I also noticed that there was much discussion amung others about it.I really don't want that picture of Beyonce to be on the article.It's a nice picture but it's not strong enough to be at the top of the article. When people come to this page.They need to see her in a way that repesents all of her accomplishments.This picture does half- of that!Not 100%!So until You,I and MarsRover came come to an agreement on what picture we should use for the article I've taken it down. User:K.M.D1994 10:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

OK ozurbanmusic I've decided on a couple of pictures. Go to google and type in "Beyonce has accomplished alot".Then go to page 2 and scroll down until you see the picture of her in the blue dress! That's one! If you don't like that one type in "Beyonce at the "Obsessed Primiere". Then scroll down until you pick a picture! Thanks! 10:46, 12 November 2010 User:K.M.D1994 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Summerbeatz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Summerbeatz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Altiyan Childs. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. While I agree with your edits, please note that the debate over whether an image is free or not free is not vandalism as you noted in one of your edits and is not a valid exemption from 3RR. Regardless, I have put the image up for deletion on commons and went ahead and removed the image again. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 13:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 06:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lightsout (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I honestly forgot about the three-revert rule until I was reminded about it this morning. I did however discuss the dispute with the user who kept adding the non-free images on the Altiyan Childs article. I explained to the user a couple of times that copyrighted images are not allowed to be used in musician articles like Altiyan's but the user wouldn't listen to me and kept on adding the image. I then discussed the issue with the user over and over again and the user replied back using bad language. I then reported this matter to a user who is great with helping people. I hope someone could explain to the user that copyrighted images are not allowed to be used in infoboxes on musician articles, as he/she clearly doesn't understand me.

Accept reason:

I understand that you were acting in good faith and that you had not made a revert after the warning given (despite the other user involved making yet another revert), so this block does not appear to be preventative. With consent of the blocking administrator below, I've gone ahead and released the block. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 06:59, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Comment form blocking admin - I blocked this user having just declined the unblock request from the other party, and I couldn't see immediately why only side had been blocked. However, looking at this further, it seems that Ozurbanmusic made no further warring after Shirik's comments above, and was acting in the right interests by removing allegedly copyright material. Therefore if any admin wants to overturn this block, feel free to do so. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 06:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I have to admit that is the reason I didn't report this user in the report to WP:ANEW as well, and I have every belief that the user was acting in good faith. Given your acceptance of the above I'm going to overturn this block. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 06:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Twenty Ten

Hi Oz. I was hoping you would do that. I have never actually created a page, just edited them. I will add a bit more detail about what is actually contained in the album and do a full track listing and credits in the next day or two. And add a critical reception section if it gets any. It may not, seeing it is mainly songs from his previous albums, although he has recorded ten of them acoustically as well.

On another subject I was wondering if you might be able to make a song sample of Receive The Power sometime. I don't know how to, and I thought it would be good on the Receive The Power page and maybe even to add to his songwriting section on his main page. I saw somewhere that there is no real restriction on how many music samples you use as long as they are relevant. I reckon one more wouldn't hurt.

I think Who's That Girl will justify having a page as well if you felt inclined to start one. It looks as if it will do alright in the charts.

Natbelle (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I was actually thinking that the "personnel" section is going to be huge, seeing the songs are from five different albums. Every song on the Twenty disc has a listing of the musicians, producers etc. It is going to take me some time to weed out the repeats. It is going to be a bit of a challenge. lol. The acoustic disc will be simpler. They were all produced by Guy and have the same musicians.

Natbelle (talk) 13:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Oz. I have done some work on the Tracklisting section you did. There were a few mistakes, some names missing, and having the writers and producers together under "Music" is a bit confusing. I have put writers and producers seperately.

I have done a few other changes in other sections too. Some grammer correction and adding a little more information.

Also the common term recently for an album like this is "retrospective" rather than greatest hits [1] I prefer that name. Greatest hits sounds a bit over the top for an artist whose career is only 7 years old.

I was also wondering if there is any real need to list the producers in the infobox in this case. There are so many (lots which you haven't listed) that it will really stretch the infobox out. Unless there is a way to hide them I would think as they are all now listed in the tracklisting they could be removed from the infobox.

Also the Dre referred to for Who's That Girl is not Dr Dre. It is Andre Harris (he goes by the name Dre too).

I know in the narrative part of a wikipedia page you only refer to someone's full name once and then only their surname, I believe in the giving of credit for songwriting and producion that the full name should used. You can see this on this track listing in a featured Article about Michael Jackson's Thriller album as a sample [2] Just using the name "Sebastian" is not clear enough for credits I don't believe. When you are talking about the person in the narrative it is obvious who you are referring to. But as far as credits go it could very well be another Sebastian who wrote or produced the song. I have therefore changed all the "Sebastians" to "Guy Sebastian" in the credits.

I will work on a "personnel" section in the next few days, and also add some more information in the background section. I have seen a few things in interviews where he talked about the album. Just have to remember where so I can find the references.

Natbelle (talk) 15:41, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that Undercover interview, but it was about Like It Like That, so doesn't really help here. But I have seen him talk about this album in a recent interview and the reason for it, and how he wanted to make it different by recording the acoustic versions so fans who already had the songs could get something new. Just have to try to remember which one. Anyway it doesn't really matter. I am sure something will come up in future interviews. It doesn't matter if the article is a little on the lean side right now. Thanks for starting the "Who's That Girl" page as well. Looks great. I don't think there is anything I could add to it right now. You have done a super job.

Natbelle (talk) 00:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey Oz. I just noticed that there are no musician credits in the liner notes of the album apart from for the acoustic tracks. They have the songwriters, producers and engineering credits but not the musicians for the first disc. Short of going through all my other albums I don't know how to get them. Was wondering if it would be really necessary. There are different musicians involved in so many of the tracks, simply because they have been recorded over five albums and in a number of different countries (Australia, US and a few in Europe). Was wondering if just listing the production and vocal personnel for the first disc would be enough. It is going to be a big task to get a full list, and it will be very long. What do you think?

Natbelle (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

This is all its got for "Who's That Girl" Oz. Written by Guy Sebastian, with rap written by Eve. Produced by Guy Sebastian and Andre Harris for Vidal Dre Productions. Doesn't list any mixing or other engineering credits, so I am guessing Andre Harris did all that as well. So I guess a personnel section for that one won't really be necessary.

Natbelle (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the song sample Oz. Yep I saw that video the other day. But I heard so many interviews etc they are all jumbled up in my mind. Would be worth listening to again to see whether there is something he said that could be added to the page. Will do that later. Thank you. Will get around to doing the Personnel list soon too. Must get back into real life for a few hours. The internet is a great time waster.

Natbelle (talk) 08:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Oz. Just thought I would let you know I have decided to go through all Guy's album liners to find the musicians who played on the songs, as I think they should be on the credits on the wiki page. It will be long and take a while to do but I reckon they should be there. I am going to do the credit listing similiar to the way it is on Beyonce's Sasha Fierce album[3] The credit listing there is huge too but they still did it all. I won't put the managerial credits though. Just musicians, vocalists and production credits. Anyway it may be a day or so before I get it finished. I have also thought about ways of extending the background section to give it more detail which I will do after getting through the credits.

182.239.148.235 (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Oops that was me. Forgot to log in. Natbelle (talk) 00:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Personnel section done Oz. [4] What a job. I decided to do it track by track. Way too hard to do it any other way, and as some people were only involved with one song and others had lots of imput in many songs I thought that was better anyway. I took the producers out of the track listing section as they are in the personnel section now. Makes the track listing section less cluttered. I will work on extending the body of the article in the next day or so. Natbelle (talk) 04:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking of putting a bit about NZ in the actual Twenty Ten page, rather than in his main page as putting too much stuff in can clutter it. He did lots of promo in NZ earlier this year, spending a week over there with lots of interviews etc and a concert and I didn't put that in, just mentioned Art Of Love's chart peak and accreditation. Might just mention any charting he does for this release if it happens on his main page. He should chart well with the single, but may not with the album. I am about to go and do an update on various pages. So many pages out there to add chart information to. It was 6 last count. May be 8 now. lol Natbelle (talk) 11:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

No worries Oz. It will have to wait though. I am knee deep in internet sites etc doing research for the background section on Twenty Ten. So I won't have time today, and I won't be home tomorrow. But I will get to it. Are you able to do a sound sample of "Who's That Girl" sometime as well. Natbelle (talk) 06:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I Am... World Tour

Hi, you may be right but try to understand that i am putting information according to the sources we have. It seems that you like Beyonce a lot (just like me) since you are always keeping an eye on her articles. We should work together. It would be great. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 08:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


Thanks a lot, i am very happy you like my work. I'll let you know when i have some problems while editing (it happens quite often). See you till then and i will try to find the tracklisting. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I know it has been written both formats there but yet, there is something fishy since not only walmart but also amazon and itunes (US) have the standard track listing. Don't worry, i will see how the matter progresses in the coming days. I suggest we wait for a maximum of two days. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, hope you are doing well. Yes, we can add it. The review is from The New Zealand Herald Jivesh boodhun (talk) 06:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


You are most welcome. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, hope you are fine? I have a question. How come, I Am... World Tour sells more than 7500 copies with a gold certification debuts at number 6 and ROSES FROM THE SOUTH of Andre Rieu, which has no certification, implying it sold much less, debuts at number 1????????????????? Jivesh boodhun (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


Ah ok. Thanks for your explanation. You are an amazing teacher. HAHAHA. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 06:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


I am sincerely sorry for such late reply. I was very busy. I hope you forgive me? Lol. Yes i will add it soon. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 13:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Of course i like her. I love R&B and Hip-Hop music. They are like oxygen for me. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Why Don't You Love Me

Please participate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Why_Don't_You_Love_Me_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song)#Single.3F Jivesh boodhun (talk) 05:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


Thanks. You are really kind. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)