Can you wikiepdia stop giving sh***t and misleading information to people? follow what Wikiepdia principles which you chant every moment, discuss first!!! 18.104.22.168 (talk) 07:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- For what's it worth, you are correct the sources in the article don't support the allegation in regard to Al-Qaeda. I've trimmed your version, and included another reference. Could you tell me what you think? PhilKnight (talk) 08:13, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, what i know as a journalist that Morsi was kidnapped by coup military, but your version is better than the previous one. do not you also think that there are some of editors who are in favor of coup and they impose POV, for example the phrase of as ¨a conscious response¨, has a POV, if it was a conscious response why millions are still in the street protesting against the coup!!, i suggest replacing ¨as a conscious response to the demands of millions of Egyptians demanding the end of Morsi's reign and the initiation of early presidential elections¨ with ¨After June 2013 Egyptian protest¨. This is more neutral. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not "giving sh**t" to anyone; I have no dog in this fight. But if you're going to edit Wikipedia articles, you need to do so in proper English, avoid editorializing, and maintain an encyclopedic tone. If you don't, somebody is probably going to revert you. It's as simple as that. -Kudzu1 (talk) 20:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.