User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

December 2012[edit]

We get it. You got a thing against Canterbury. However, you cannot use Wikipedia to promote your cause. You will need to privide reliable third party sources that support your claims and present the content in an appropriate manner, particularly content regarding living people. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your suggested changes WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED unless the follow the content policies I linked in the above message. Please stop wasting your time with edits like [1] which make claims that are not in any way supported by the source.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dual Survival, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been reported to the vandalism notice board. Please expect to be blocked shortly. And No. we will NOT be accepting your proposed changes. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Your inappropriate suggestions have not been approved the last 27 times you tried in the past 30 minutes, do you really think that there is any chance they will be on the 28th? Please stop wasting your time. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JohnCD (talk) 19:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)