User talk:124.180.159.192

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paul von Hindenburg. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TINYMARK 09:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to English Defence League, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: English Defence League was changed by 124.180.159.192 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929753 on 2012-01-01T08:37:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at English Defence League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Minima© (talk) 08:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

124.180.159.192 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

you wanna fuk with the best n end up like the rest?

Decline reason:

Oh yes, childish threats are so effective (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 00:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

124.180.159.192 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

unblock, me, NOWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!124.180.159.192 (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nope Jac16888 Talk 01:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tommy Robinson (English Defence League) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at English Defence League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: English Defence League was changed by 124.180.159.192 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910717 on 2012-01-10T09:28:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Jim1138. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mark91it's my world 09:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to English Defence League. Mark91it's my world 09:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC) But it's the truth? Ive been with heaps of white chicks and they all say the same thing, you whites are baby in the sack ;) Im just sayin is all! ;)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to English Defence League, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: English Defence League was changed by 124.180.159.192 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874639 on 2012-01-24T13:19:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at English Defence League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Human penis size. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Iran–European Union relations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Iran–European Union relations was changed by 124.180.159.192 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866957 on 2012-01-27T08:40:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

how long am i blocked for this time??124.180.159.192 (talk) 09:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

124.180.159.192 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am on Telstra Internet, Melbourne AU proxy server, I have been blocked but have no idea why, I have never been on wikipedia, why am I linked to this freedom fighter internet rebel? If I make my ACCOUNT and noone but me can log in can I be unblocked that account only? Thankyou for your consideration I will not be argumentative like the other person on this proxy server =)124.180.159.192 (talk) 4:27 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Per Berean Hunter below. You are very clearly the same person that was vandalizing earlier. TNXMan 13:50, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

YOU HAVE NO PROOF I AM INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!!!124.180.159.192 (talk) 06:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

A few suggestions[edit]

Hi 124.180.159.192, and again welcome to Wikipedia.

First of all, it would be helpful to both you and to the Wikipedia project if you registered an account.

I notice that you mentioned here that you are a young person. It might be a good idea to read this essay.

You also mentioned that English is not your first language. There are Wikipedias in many languages, and you may be interested in contributing to the Wikipedia in your first language.

You also mentioned that you are a Muslim, and (like me) an Australian. Notable Muslim Australians needs a lot of work. I would be more than happy to work with you there, and on any other subject!
--Shirt58 (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

INSHALAH you are my hero! but can you now unblock me so i can make an account? peace124.180.159.192 (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
This block needs to stand. The person making the unblock request is the person who was blocked. No other edits have come out of that address and the unblock request above is disingenuous.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 12:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

"This block has been set to expire: 09:06, 27 February 2012. " yes it is CLEARLY past this date unblock me now so i can make my account and contribute124.180.159.192 (talk) 06:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC) I am still blocked. let me ask you this because I am being silenced. this because the blocker is racist? WHAT THE F is wrong with your BRAIN you WHITE SUPREM!ST piece of WHITE DOG5H!T! if you did this to my face i would punish you badly!124.180.159.192 (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I refuse to accept the authority of ANY other wikipedia user than Shirt58, as i know he will not be racist towards me as he is also a Muslim in this country. Shirt58 brother you have sole authority to contact me all others will be ignored124.180.159.192 (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

124.180.159.192 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I AM STILL BLOCKED AND THE BLOCK WAS END BY NOW BUT I AM STILL BLOCKED WHY WHY WHY WHY!!! I WANT TO MAKE AN ACCOUNT IT SAYS THAT THE BLOCK WAS SET TO EXPIRE YESTERDAY WHYYYY AM I STILL BLOCKED!124.180.159.192 (talk) 11:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

1. Stop yelling. 2. It's not February yet. Closedmouth (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

This block has been set to expire: 09:06, 27 February 2012.

today is the 28th i am not stupid whyyyy am i still blocked???

MATERIELSCIENTIST what is your problem??? you hide behind a computer like a bitch afraid to let me confront you with your mental problems and small white dick0!124.180.159.192 (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

That outburst has resulted in your editing privileges for this page being revoked. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)