User talk:124.185.223.97

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 2007[edit]

  1. Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to HEMP Party, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- intgr 11:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Replacing "and" with "&"[edit]

Please stop replacing "and" with "&" in articles, as it violates the manual of style. —dgiestc 09:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, please stop this. Continuing to do this is disruptive. -SpuriousQ (talk) 12:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Savannah (cat), makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ST47Talk 12:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Another editor reverted your edits to Queensland Tiger having identified them as vandalism. They were then reverted back and will likely be reverted again to the more constructive edit. In your edit, you replaced the word and with & which is not proper style, changed other spellings to British spellings and clogged the article up with uncessary and repetative links. We only link to another wikipedia article the first time a word or term is mentioned - not every time its mentioned. We also don't link to each and every basic word that has an article - only the ones that might enhance a reader's understanding of the topic being covered or that might be unfamiliar. I won't revert the current reversion, but if someone else does, please don't go back and revert it again.LiPollis 13:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)