User talk:144.136.101.108

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

]]. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Deputy Prime Minister of Australia. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 16:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last and only warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tony Crook (politician).   -- Lear's Fool 11:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 144.136.101.108. You have new messages at Lear's Fool's talk page.
Message added 12:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  -- Lear's Fool 12:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011 continued[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Mark Dreyfus. Thank you. Jan1naD (talkcontrib) 14:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Here are just two references:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/11/3161975.htm http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/8996858/abbotts-tax-strategy-likened-to-nazi-propaganda/

PROD of Ian Rintoul[edit]

Please be advised that, as stated in WP:DEPROD, once a PROD has been contested, it may not be replaced. If you think the article should be deleted, you should use the Articles for Deletion process. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mark Dreyfus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 04:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to New South Wales state election, 2011, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 10:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

What's wrong is that you added something that Igloo told me was probable vandalism. Having read your talk page, I have good reason to be suspicious about you and a previous block. --The Master of Mayhem 10:54, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect to you I am very puzzled as to how you can think adding a table of Newspaper endorsments for the election is vandalism. Please explain.144.136.101.108 (talk) 10:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   -- Lear's Fool 14:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Why? I made a constructive edit listing a number of Newspaper endorsments for NSW State election. How is that vandalism?144.136.101.108 (talk) 15:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

You're a serial vandal adding false information to Australian political articles. Go find something better to do.  -- Lear's Fool 15:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the insult mate. Surely that's against wikipedia policies? Here is the link to the Sunday Telegraph endorsment. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/do-something-big-premier-ofarrell/story-e6frezz0-1226024576158

Please explain why you deleted the Newspaper endorsment section. 144.136.101.108 (talk) 15:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE EXPLAIN

"Premier-elect"[edit]

When do you wish to stop making a fool of yourself? Respect the way it's always been, respect westminster, and most of all, respect wikipedia or be banned! Timeshift (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

TimeShift, I cannot be banned for making a mistake. Kind regards. It's been really lovely dealing with you.144.136.101.108 (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
No, but you can be banned if you continue to ignore everyone and insist on your incorrect falsehoods. But it appears you've embarrassingly backed down on that. So we're all happy campers now! Timeshift (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Windale, New South Wales[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Windale, New South Wales. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You really need to start discussing this instead of reverting AussieLegend (talk) 10:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marrickville Council, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox 11:57, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marrickville Council. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox 12:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marrickville Council, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox 12:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Marrickville Council[edit]

In reply to User_talk:Xionbox#Marrickville_Council Thanks for making me laugh. 'Til next time! Xionbox 13:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)