User talk:152.26.51.95

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by filling out this form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.


Recent edits to Titania[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have posted content to the Titania article in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English. Thank you! Carmichael [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 19:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Messiah, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃   17:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Buff-bellied fat-tailed mouse opossum, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlotte Motor Speedway, you may be blocked from editing. Flyer22 (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to American Enlightenment, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bolivia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bolivia was changed by 152.26.51.95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90523 on 2013-09-24T13:38:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patients Out of Time. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Patients Out of Time was changed by 152.26.51.95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889533 on 2013-09-24T14:40:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Patients Out of Time with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. RA0808 talkcontribs 14:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

152.26.51.95 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Looking through the contributions of the IP I feel as if several of the "vandalisms" were actually accidental mistakes or real contributions that were marked as mistakes. I am in no way saying that there weren't obvious cases of vandalism, however I feel as if the school should be given an additional chance. The block reason was also very vague, and I also feel that getting account creation blocked is an extreme measure. Please unblock account creation at the very least (people at this school don't go as far as to create an account to vandalize), and better and more clearly specify why the block has been put in place. At the very least, lower the ban time to one semester (which is when the vandals with computer access are most likely to lose it. This semester ends around Jan 30 2015.152.26.51.95 (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I disagree almost completely with everything you said, and in this context, I'm declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 20:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

  • This IP is blocked as part of a range block, so the vandalism doesn't necessarily come from this specific address and you won't see it by looking at this IP's contributions - you'd have to look at contributions from the whole 152.26.0.0/16 range to see it. Neatsfoot (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
check-mark
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thank you for telling me that it was part of a range block...could somebody give me a link to the contributions from that range? Thank you. 152.26.51.95 (talk) 16:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)