User talk:1549bcp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Great job on making the original Thirty-Six Immortals of Poetry article. I am glad someone else is also interested in the subject, and willing to put together a nice page on it. Ph0kin (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Creating TEC bishops articles[edit]

Hi. Thanks for creating new TEC bishop bios! However, please could you bear in mind our article naming policies (e.g. WP:COMMONNAME and WP:BISHOP) when naming these? You mind find it helpful to know that I've almost finished going through the List of bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America article and redlinking to where their bios ought to be once created (I've been carefully establishing their Common Names), so you can just click the redlinks when you want to create their biography :) DBD 17:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, and also, you might find some biographical details (with sources) for each of these bishops in the article for their diocese (e.g. Episcopal Diocese of Central New York). DBD

Oh hai. I wonder if you've seen this message? Your editing since might suggest you haven't, so please do reply here to let me know when you have. Thanks! DBD 16:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

DBD, please don't bite a newbie.

1549bcp, I think you've been doing great work in creating articles and the names you've used are fine so far as I've seen. You are using sources, which is important, as it shows the reader where the content comes from. And in general, using the name for the person you're writing about as given in the sources is the best way to go. I've been adding to some of the articles you've started and put the sources into inline citations. If you would ever like help with anything, feel free to ask. Thanks for the work you've done. Jonathunder (talk) 01:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

That was certainly not intended as biting, and I would hope it doesn't read as such. Please remember to assume good faith. DBD 12:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Robert H. Cochrane, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 2602:306:3357:BA0:15CD:8FCF:BFD0:8C7 (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halsey House (Southampton, New York), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Halsey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Forward in Faith North America[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Forward in Faith North America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a WP:PROMO of religious organization. No references to independent sources at all. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

G. P. Mellick Belshaw-apparently he was 65 in 1982[edit]

Was looking at the reference and it says the article is from 82 and mentions him being 65 years old, so I am going to move to possibly living, unless if we can find anything saying he is dead or alive for G. P. Mellick Belshaw. Wgolf (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Forward in Faith North America for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forward in Faith North America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward in Faith North America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)