User talk:167.107.191.217

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Andrew Gulledge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

167.107.191.217 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

The supposed contravention [1] was a proposed deletion. I am not the same person who did that proposition (this is a shared IP), but I think that it was not only in good faith, but also a shared feeling, because the original author asked for the page to be deleted [2]. In this moment the page has the same template inserted by 167.107.191.217 and deleted by SarekOfVulcan [3]. 167.107.191.217 17:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Somebody creates his own biography (compare [4] and [5]), then asks his biography to be deleted, and because he does it from an IP, the IP is blocked and the edition is reverted. He asks the same request from his account [6] and this time is not blocked and is not reverted. 167.107.191.217 (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

In SarekOfVulcan's page you can read: Note: if I've made a clearly bad block, such as something that appears to be vandalism at first glance but actually has a good explanation, please unblock without waiting for me to come back online. If it's something less clear, please at least get consensus on AN/I first. Thanks.

I think this case is very clear. 167.107.191.217 (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

blockong admin agrees block was made in error. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ferengi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • are seen to take sensual delight when their ears are stimulated, described by the word umox (''"oo-mox".'' The exact meaning is unclear: "there is no direct translation" See [[Ménage à Troi (
  • have also been known to sell weapons to both sides in a war, though this may be looked down upon (even in such cases, the logic is often used that they don't make customers actually use weapons, so

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Continuous integration. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to user talk:Bearian, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

P.S. "I even reversed the block, and I still get hassled. Why can't people take "yes" for an answer?" Bearian (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Personal attack[edit]

Please do not call other editors "you dumb fuck" as you did at Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 2553, its not clever and not appreciated. MilborneOne (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. An edit you recently made to James Madison University seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃   21:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

July 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yiran because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.