User talk:169.1.11.199

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Cape Weaver has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

16:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
RPSkokie (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

STOP with the categorization!

I noticed your categorization efforts yesterday, and it immediately occurred to me that that what you are doing is superfluous doubling and tripling of necessary categories. E.g., if a taxon is already in the category "Endemic birds of South Africa", it should NOT also be in the less specific categories "Fauna of Africa" and "Endemic fauna of Africa". I trust you see the redundancy there - these categories are actually nested, so all you are doing is pointlessly multplying entries. I checked with the Categorization Wikiproject and was confirmed in my suspicion. In addition, many of your added "endemic" cats are wrong - e.g., the Cape cormorant is not endemic to South Africa, since it also occurs in Namibia. - I am therefore asking you to stop this redundant categorization. All of these edits will have to be undone. I shall be asking an administrator to perform a mass rollback. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

• Okay, I have undone the majority of these edits. Please take the above to heart - don't apply parent categories if a child category is already present (see Wikipedia:Categorization#Subcategorization), and don't apply wrong categories. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Final warning

Switching from spurious biogeography categories to spurious conservation categories now, I see. Of the ten random samples I pulled of your current spree, seven were wrong - the species did not even have an IUCN categorisation. I have, again, reverted all of these edits. Apparently it wasn't clear enough the last time round, so here it is in bold: The next time you start applying mass categories with this appalling sloppiness, you are very likely to be blocked from editing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

... so apparently we have to do this in small steps. You can only add material to Wikipedia if you can provide a reliable reference. In the case of claimed IUCN status, that is the respective IUCN page. You cannot just add a status into the taxbox; you also need to provide a citation to that species page, and it is unrealistic to expect other people to clean up after you by providing these in your stead. To add the status citation to the box, I suggest using this template:

<ref name=IUCN>{{cite iucn |url=[page address]|title=[page title]|authors= [assessor names]|year=[assessment date]|accessdate=[today's date]}}</ref>

Replace the placeholders in square brackets (including the brackets) with the page's respective data, and add the template into the box at "status_ref = ". --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Protea burchellii, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Protea stokoei. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Leucadendron arcuatum

Hello, 169.1.11.199. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leucadendron arcuatum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucadendron laxum has been accepted

Leucadendron laxum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucadendron daphnoides has been accepted

Leucadendron daphnoides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucadendron stelligerum has been accepted

Leucadendron stelligerum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucadendron burchellii has been accepted

Leucadendron burchellii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 16:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serruria rosea has been accepted

Serruria rosea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 20:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aulax umbellata has been accepted

Aulax umbellata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serruria phylicoides has been accepted

Serruria phylicoides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

---