User talk:174.102.69.58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yom Kippur, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yom Kippur was changed by 174.102.69.58 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957411 on 2011-11-07T13:44:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sweeney (name) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Yom Kippur with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Football League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shearonink (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Kgpg new.svg To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Wknight94 talk 17:25, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Orologio rosso.svg
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
174.102.69.58 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log)
174.102.69.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

{| style="background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #A00; padding:5px;" |Kgpg new.svg To edit, please log in.


Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

|}

Decline reason:

This is not an autoblock but a direct block, which is fully justified. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


{{unblock | My edits were found with sources}

Considering the nature of your editing, that failed attempt at an unblock request is itself effectively vandalism. That sort of nonsense is likely to leas to an increase of the block, not an end to it. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)