User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Men in skirts[edit]

Men in skirts was deleted in accordance to Criteria for speedy deletion: General criteria #4, because it was a recreation of previously deleted material, albeit under a different title (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Male Unbifurcated Garment and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men's fashion freedom). Re-creation of the article was also rejected by a deletion review. --Ezeu 21:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Uncle Ben[edit]

Hi, do you have any hard evidence that "Uncle Ben" refers to the Superman character more often than the rice spokesman in common usage? I haven't any firm basis, but I felt sure that the rice guy was much better known. We might just have to make it a disambiguation page.

Eleland 22:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah, Google gives 12 hits on the rice guy before anything on Spiderman (not counting the Wikipedia page). I really think it should point to Uncle Ben's.

Eleland 22:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but this is only due to similarity of the names. Take a look at Special:Whatlinkshere/Uncle Ben and you will see that Spiderman related articles which links to Uncle Ben vastly outnumber any other articles linking there. Also Uncle Ben's is very rarely (maybe never) called "Uncle Ben". -- 09:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Good work[edit]

Good work on your edits. Keep this way! -- 01:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Medcab case[edit]

Hello, you were a participant in a Mediation Cabal case that has been re-listed as possibly needing a new mediator. The case is listed at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-20 Male genital mutilation. As some time has passed since there was last any activity on this case, I'm checking in to see if this is still an active dispute that requires mediation, and if so, to indicate that I am willing to take it up. Please let me know. Otherwise if this is no longer an active dispute I'll simply de-list the case, and thanks for your time. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 14:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

January 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to July 16. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 02:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


I did what was requested on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Bands. You were involved in that discussion, so what do you think? --Qsaw (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Poynting Vector[edit]

I agree that the divergence of the flow will be zero. But has any such flow been detected? I just quoted Jordan Balmain when I did that edit. Weltanschaunng 05:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cradle of Filth. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Funeral 21:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cradle of Filth, you will be blocked from editing. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The Sequence for Maxwell's equations[edit]

You are probably right. And it's probably best to keep to the tradition. If you know how to label these equations it will then remove any ambiguity as regards the history section. I had put Faraday's law last because it required a special discussion in the history section as it doesn't appear in exactly that form in any of Maxwell's papers. I wanted it to mirror the chronology of the history section.

If you label the equations in the introduction, that will remove all ambiguity. I was unable to label them within an acceptable format. George Smyth XI (talk) 10:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I got your message on my talk page. That's fine with me. But do you think that perhaps we should label the equations in the introduction? I would have done it but I don't know how to format it. George Smyth XI (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it looks fine now. I think that it is important to have a summary of the equations in the introduction.George Smyth XI (talk) 00:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

There is an explanation for why D corresponds to B , whereas E correspomds to H in the article Magnetic Field. B is magnetic flux density. It is the product of H and μ. The permeability quantity μ originally applied to the density of Maxwell's vortex sea. The current density term J is equal to ρv. J and B are therefore weighted terms because they both arise from multiplying a more fundamental quantity by a density term. J itself is the time differential of D, hence, D more closely parallels with B.George Smyth XI (talk) 06:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

As long as you know that D = εE and B = μH then you can use whichever of these expressions you wish in any of the equations of electromagnetism. You can write the Lorentz force as F/q = -gradΨ -(partial)dA/dt + μvXH if you so wish, just as Maxwell did. Or indeed as D = -εgradΨ -ε(partial)dA/dt + (1/c^2)vXH George Smyth XI (talk) 05:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dana White, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Accession of Croatia to the European Union, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. U5K0'sTalkMake WikiLove not WikiWar 20:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Robi Prosinecki[edit]

Hi, sorry if I was ironic in my edit summary, but it seemed unencyclopedic that we add honours in advance despite the probabilities that the outcome of the match will be that one. I was unecessarily unpleasent towards you and I apologise. Best regards and good editing :) FkpCascais (talk) 23:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Augmented reality constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Orwaldo's gablet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamesx12345 (talk) 17:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Orwaldo's gablet[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Orwaldo's gablet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no evidence that this term is used anywhere but in Wikipedia. It does not appear in any of the online references listed in this article, nor can Google books find any instance of the words "Orwaldo" or "gablet" in the offline book source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Singapore Changi Airport‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Sni56996 (talk) 04:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Tree traversal that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to LGBT movements in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Feminist]] [[ethicist]] [[Janice Raymond] in her work [[Transsexual Empire]]characterized female-to-male transsexuals as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)