User talk:200.219.132.104

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (200.219.132.104) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{help me}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Basilikon Doron may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Smout may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to North Berwick witch trials may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Long s may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to HMS Hood (51) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * {{Citation | url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/3140770/Ted-Briggs.html | type =
  • * {{Citation | url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00bdjh3 ''An Hour with Jon Pertwee''] Actor [[Jon Pertwee]] reminisces, including time serving on the ''Hood'' – streaming audio

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page IJ (digraph) has been reverted.
Your edit here to IJ (digraph) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.geocities.com/akhorlin/95-ij.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Adobe Acrobat, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Two kingdoms doctrine may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Quote | There is a twofold society, of which almost all men in the world are members, and from that

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Conventional PCI[edit]

I know that was a lot of work, and the changes are minor...but without knowing what issues are under scrutiny, it's best to be on the safe side. I never re-review anything that's been undone by it's author...that's the occasion for a second opinion. We'll see what someone else thinks. WQUlrich (talk) 20:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Another reviewer here. I agree with WQUlrich that the number of gnomish edits to this article should be made bit by bit make scrutiny of them easier. This is an article under the scrutiny of the Wikimedia Foundation Office and it needs to be treated very carefully. Or, just get yourself a wikipedia account.... - tucoxn\talk 22:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pre-Tridentine Mass may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Gospel]] is attributed to the influence of Emperor [[Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor|Henry II]] (1002–[[1024 |24[[). Gallican influence explains the practice of incensing persons, introduced in the eleventh or
  • Missal)][http://www.sacredheartconfraternity.org/uploads/Braga_Rite_Booklet_Latest_Version_1_.pdf (alternative link] Ordo Missae and Canon in Latin

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Pre-Tridentine Mass, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Pre-Tridentine Mass was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://valleadurni.blogspot.com/2012/02/use-of-nidaros.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Euromaidan may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Euromaidan may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Why did you decided to switch from UK and RU icons to Ukrainian and Russian? Please stop doing such edits as it constitutes vandalism and doesn't do any difference. In fact, the icons are better because the user can see clearly which one is which. Another thing, please don't switch between cite news/web and citation. We need to keep track of which site is which. Thank you!--Mishae (talk) 00:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

January 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for disruptive editing and not discussing issues with other editors. Also see [1]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

I've blocked this IP as it is being used to evade a block by User:Lgfcd. Please log on and use the unblock template. --John (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for block evasion (User:Lgfcd). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.