User talk:200.48.214.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (200.48.214.19) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2012)]], [[Damascus offensive (2013)]] and [[Rif Dimashq offensive (September–November 2013))|5th Rif Dimashq]]. ''
  • raises tension in Syria] [[al-Jazeera]], 9 July 2013</ref> ISIS rebels withdrew from Al-Dana.<ref>[http://www.aawsat.net/2014/01/article55326685 Syria: ISIS agrees truce, withdraws from Turkish

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Battle of Ilovaisk are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Revert[edit]

It would be nice if you gave some reasoning when reverting me. If you insist on keeping the timeline entry then fine, though I've scratched the "...Obama administration," which was the phrase that leapt out as a political jibe in the first place. Chris Smowton (talk) 20:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

No reason is needed to revert a vandalism, user Smowton. Avoid making reverts on other edits, moreover if them are sourced.200.48.214.19 (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Removing a link or editing a summary is not an example of vandalism. Not every source belongs in every article, and due weighting and proper neutral summary of those sources that are mentioned is necessary. Chris Smowton (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
It doesnt matter your arguments, just stop vandalising my edits. Be warned.200.48.214.19 (talk) 12:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
That is basically the opposite of how things are supposed to work. Arguments matter, vandalism is distinct from reversion. You should read WP:BRD -- that describes how usually, you go ahead and make a change; then if somebody (like me) disagrees with your change they revert it, then we talk about it. Chris Smowton (talk) 14:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Stop reverting edits otherwise you will be blocked200.48.214.19 (talk) 12:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
I have reverted you exactly once, so I don't know what you're talking about here. Chris Smowton (talk) 01:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
IP user 200.48.214.19, please read WP:CIVIL and don't WP:THREATEN editors. Your WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour is unacceptable. Step back, take a deep breath, then try to approach articles and discussions on a cool head. Thank you for your understanding. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

There was no reason for revert my edit, it was sourced and filled the criteria of the Timeline. Until now its still there. Harpy, I think your way in middling in others affairs in unacceptable200.48.214.19 (talk) 12:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

What you perceive as being 'unacceptable' and 'meddling' has nothing to do with Wikipedia's policies and behavioural guidelines. Trying to intimidate other users, abusive edit summaries such as this, and accusing Smowton's removal of a tiny portion of content you added with a valid reason as being vandalism is bad form... and was civilly explained to you.
As a veteran editor, my attempts to guide you are not meddling. Again, I would ask that you learn to control your temper and accept good faith advice. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Holding grudges[edit]

Please read WP:AGF. You added a comment which appears to be a personal attack on me on 25 February, well after it had been established that the "The New York Times:Ukrainian side delivered fake photographs to convince USA of Russian involvement" has been discredited as a deliberate attempt by Ukrainian security to 'fake' (or even mislead) anyone. The error happened in the USA, and was pointed out in that section by me as to why we don't just grab any reports just released before they've been checked and cross-referenced with other reliable sources in order to verify them.

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedic resource, not the news... and most certainly not WP:RECENTISM. If you wish to contribute constructively, please don't approach it as a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Thank you for your understanding. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Moderate your temper Irina, in your comments you have a not-kind way of speking to him (Molobocount). Accusing him of everthing bad its not suitable for Wikipedia. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_No_Asshole_Rule. Try to read and learn in a civilazed way, how to treat other editors. With your arrogant language you will not get anything anywhere.200.48.214.19 (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)