User talk:2001:4490:D660:0:0:0:0:B07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ragini Khanna without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —MelbourneStartalk 04:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tinu Yohannan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Pratyya (Hello!) 02:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jayakrishnan.ks100. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Hindu seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JK (talk) 05:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Hindu, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JK (talk) 10:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Narendra Modi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 06:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.