User talk:205.69.238.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


August 2008[edit]

Your edits to August 13[edit]

Dear 205.69.238.2,
Information.svg Some of your edits on the page August 13 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 08:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2008[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scott Stapp has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cflm001 (Talk) 09:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Waldensians has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://chiesavaldesedicatania.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Waldensians has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://chiesavaldesedicatania.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Orlando, Florida has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 13:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Orlando, Florida. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 13:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

November 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Nebrodi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

January 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to VP-26. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hammerhead shark, you will be blocked from editing. -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Naval Air Station Sigonella, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Naval Air Station Sigonella was changed by 205.69.238.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914936 on 2012-03-07T14:10:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Retest!![edit]

Perhaps Matthew Fomby should retake their Mensa test, because attempting to add themselves to List of Mensans (a) created nothing but red links, and (b) it was pretty explicit that each entry requires a reliable source reference to confirm their membership … but none of that matters because Matthew Fomby is not notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia, and this list is only for people who have articles.

You don't need to be a member of Mensa to figure all this out, but anyone with a 98th percentile IQ shouldn't have missed any of these points. :-)

Happy Editing! — 74.96.38.203 (talk · contribs) 04:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)