User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bishop, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bishop, California was changed by (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967159 on 2012-04-04T17:00:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

February 2013[edit]

This is not constructive. First, it's clearly a personal comment. Second, it's not even clear what you mean:

  • Do you think it would be nicer if carrier pigeons could fly longer distances?
  • Do you think the number is not correct?

If the former, then this really does not belong in an encyclopedia. If the latter, then you will have to provide a source or at least explain why you think the source is wrong. In any case you can't just drop a personal comment in an article and expect that it stays there. Thank you. Hans Adler 17:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)