User talk:217.218.67.253

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Orologio rosso.svg
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
217.218.67.253 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log)
217.218.67.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AbdolRezaCCIH". The reason given for AbdolRezaCCIH's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigati


Decline reason:

Unfortunately, this IP has recently been abused by another user, and thus clearing the autoblock would allow the abusive user back on. To avoid similar irrelevant blocks, I recommend creating an account from a non-shared IP. Alternatively, you can go to http://toolserver.org/~acc to request an account. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


Wikipedia Checkuser.svg
CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address or network has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. Please use the account creation request form to request an account under your preferred username. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. If using the form, please refer to this block under "comments". If e-mailing, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block without consulting a CheckUser. Administrators who undo CheckUser blocks without permission from a CheckUser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Alison 03:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

July 2012[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Sophie Mirabella. Thank you.


In general, please add edit summaries especially when not logged in. Mark Hurd (talk) 03:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 22:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


Your edits have been opposed by two different editors, seize edit warring and take it to the talkpage. Your suggestion that I "look up" a page number for text that you're pushing is so ridiculous not only from a common sense point of view, but also from the point of view of Wikipedia's guidelines: "the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material". Your statement that Bosnian political parties are divided by religion is flawed. The majority of parties are based on ethnic nationalism not religious principles. So again, this is not a religious political party, by your logic every party should say "Croat Catholic" party, "Serb Orthodox" party" or, as you've done, "Bosniak Muslim" party. It's nonsense. I also noted that you've edit warred on the "Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran" article, such persistent disruptive behavior is not tolerated.-- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 13:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

October 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page HispanTV has been reverted.
Your edit here to HispanTV was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/hispantv) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Stop spamming articles with unsourced information. Artavasdes (talk) 07:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beautification Organization of Tehran Municipality concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beautification Organization of Tehran Municipality, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beautification Organization of Tehran Municipality[edit]

Hello 217.218.67.253. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Beautification Organization of Tehran Municipality".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beautification Organization of Tehran Municipality}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)