User talk:219.65.103.43

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 219.65.103.43, has made edits to Ayodhya which do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Lucknow. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Batternut (talk) 00:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lucknow. Jim1138 (talk) 07:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Gujrat City. Likewise at Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh. Batternut (talk) 09:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. The link you provided bared no relation to the preceding text. Batternut (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise your edits to Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, Chandauli, Auraiya. Please read WP:REFSPAM. Batternut (talk) 01:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Batternut (talk) 02:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding external links[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for adding inappropriate external links to articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:ANI. See the notice above. An example is this edit, where you added an external link which appears to have nothing to do with the context. Presumably you wished to publicize the link, and you didn't care that it had no value for the article. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]