User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your edit to Oxbow%2C_North_Dakota[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Oxbow,_North_Dakota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

November 2008[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Common law has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —La Pianista (TCS) 01:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Information.png The recent edit you made to Human feces constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 01:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Esmond, North Dakota, you will be blocked from editing. Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, your additions to Esmond, North Dakota are not acceptable because the facts are not-notable, unsourced and un-verifiable. Do not re-add them. Thanks, DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 06:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)