Jump to content

User talk:2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Bellary. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Wesoree (Talk) 23:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that triggered the edit filter.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 23:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Alexf, this is a demonstrably bad block. I was following up on my report to ANI, and beginning to revert mass disruption by a blocked IP range [1]. Any help, Drmies, ToBeFree? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Procedural, block has been lifted. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexf, this block makes the encyclopedia worse. Please reconsider quickly. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:53, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errors happen. Corrected. Unblocked. Sorry. -- Alexf(talk) 01:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion, and nobody's minding AIV

[edit]

Drmies, you've dealt with their other socks recently: Truffaultparislyon (talk · contribs). 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 16:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. jp×g 09:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Let me check. jp×g 09:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was indeed a bad revert. Please accept my apologies. jp×g 09:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated. Waiting for someone to block the user. Cheers. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 10:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kaura Khan Qaisrani, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.jp×g 11:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two fuckups in one night! On this one, I have no idea what happened. I actually remember making the revert -- there was a huge block of garbage with "DRAMA:" in it, and Huggle showed me the exact opposite (i.e. that the garbage had been added in the diff rather than removed), and I rolled it back. I am not sure why it would have done that -- I have set it to remove revisions from the queue if there have been subsequent edits to the page. I think a bug report may be in order. In the meantime I will go through and review my rollbacks for tonight. Sorry for the hassle, and thank you for letting me know. jp×g 11:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An idle hypothesis I just came up with is that I've recently moved to a rather remote place, and the Internet connection sometimes randomly cuts out for a couple seconds. It may be possible that you reverted the vandalism, Huggle never received the new revision from the recent changes feed, and when it sent the rollback action, it reverted you instead of the vandal. This seems quite troubling and shouldn't be possible. Like I said, I will go and review my rollbacks from tonight. jp×g 11:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I manually checked 176 reverts and undid two of them. The rest seem to have worked fine -- I think there may be an issue with rollbacks working improperly in Huggle when there's a subsequent IP edit (?) Either that or I am an idiot. In any case, sorry. jp×g 13:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
JPxG, you may be right about a glitch in the technology--this has happened a number of times in the past, and we've always thought it was sloppiness brought about by reverting too quickly. Maybe using rollback too often, too quickly creates occasional collateral damage. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 03:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your recent copyright violation removal! XtraJovial (talkcontribs) 14:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]