Hello, I'm Makecat. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nystagmus without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Makecat 06:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- That's fine. But this removal is a bit controversial, and you'd better provide an edit summary. --Makecat 07:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- The criticism of the studies needs to be also sourced; otherwise, it could be seen as original research which is outside the scope of Wikipedia. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Given the relatively obscure nature of the study such external formal criticism is unlikely to be generated. I could rewrite the edit so that it references relevant entries, such as Evidence-based medicine which specifically highlight why these studies qualify as poor quality.
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)