Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to 10-second barrier, unsourced unencyclopedic personal comment, constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 07:23, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry but your entire edit was as follows: "It is yet to be seen if non-East African descended sprinters can sprint at the same rates as East Africans." This appears to be an opinion or speculation and possibly have inappropriate undertones. You do not support it with any citations to any reliable, verifiable, neutral sources. So I do not see any research at all. Additionally, the article shows that almost all of the persons who broke the barrier were North Americans, including Carribean islanders. How do you know some of these people are not "non-East African" descendants, or have been in North America so long that their distant ancestry should not matter and that this is not a suspect statement. This type of POV commentary is not appropriate for an encyclopedia in any event. Donner60 (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- By the way, there is enough discussion of the subject in the article already, in more neutral phrasing, and most of the persons are described as of West African descent, not East African. Donner60 (talk) 23:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's already stated in the article. I suggest you go on to something else instead of expounding on something that is already covered. Donner60 (talk) 03:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea what you are talking about in your message about slandering Germans. Your comment is placed under the Paula Hitler topic. Quite clearly I had undone my reversion of the edit to Paula Hitler very quickly when the mistake about the name of her husband was pointed out to me. The edit that inserted the name and my mistaken reversion had nothing to do with the numbers or percentages of people killed in the Holocaust (unless something else was inadvertently carried along because it was part of the same edit). My problem with the edit was that it seemed that the person who made it (a different IP address, but perhaps still you?) had put in the name of her husband which I thought was wrong. I mistook that addition for vandalism because it was the same name as a later celebrity. That is a type of vandalism that is seen from time to time. I pointed this out in the reply to the IP user who made the edit and pointed out how I had come to make the error. In fact, the two people just happened to have the same name. I have edited no article coming from your IP address since the edit about which the messages above were exchanged. Donner60 (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Institute for Historical Review has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Institute for Historical Review was changed by 126.96.36.199 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916916 on 2013-09-08T01:34:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)