User talk:50.9.48.58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (50.9.48.58) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

Reference Errors on 11 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hidalgo. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

In particular, WP:MOSDAB states only one blue link per entry. Since it is a Manual of Style, that makes it absolutely inviolable. TLA 3x ♭ 16:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • musical selections from his works, and from the ''Sinfonia Eroica'', conducted by [[Sir Georg Solti}Georg Solti]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • finale of the ballet ''[[The Creatures of Prometheus]]'', Op. 43 (1801); and as the theme of the [[Erpica Variations|Variations and Fugue for Piano in E{{music|b}} major, Opus 35'' (1802), also

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven)[edit]

Thank you for you edits to the article Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven). However, please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's Manual of Style and related guidelines mentioned there before you revert edits which try to follow those. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Copy editing[edit]

Please read WP:MEDMOS and WP:MOS. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gore Vidal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Timothy McVeigh]] perpetrated the [[Oklahoma City bombing]] (1995), Vidal concluded that McVeigh (a politically-disillusioned U.S. Army veteran of the [[Gulf War|First Iraq War]] (1990–91) had

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gore Vidal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • (i) the [[Ludington Line]] (later [[Eastern Airlines]]); (ii) [[Transcontinental Air Transport]] (later [[TWA|Trans World Airlines]]; (iii) [[Northeast Airlines]] (with Amelia Earhart); and the [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dwight Macdonald may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • New York Intellectuals]] (left-wing anti–Stalinists) and of the Marxist [[Frankfurt School]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Lewandowski|first=Tadeusz|title=Dwight Macdonald on Culture: The Happy Warrior of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vortex may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''.<ref>The Oxford English Dictionary</ref><ref>The Merriam Webster Collegiate Dictionary</ref>) Vortices form in stirred fluids, such as [[liquid]], [[gas]], and [[plasma (physics)|plasma]], e.g.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lebensraum may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''''Lebensraum''''' {{Audio|De-Lebensraum.ogg|listen}} ([[German: “living space”) was a racist ideology that proposed the aggressive, territorial expansion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:16, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lebensraum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1943) and at the [[Battle of Kursk]] (July – August 1943) in Russia, and [[Operation Husky]] ((July – August 1943), the Allied invasion of Sicily, ended the implementation of Nazi Germany's

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Negationism[edit]

Hi, 50.9.48.58!

When it comes to the negationism page, I really do not think it matters if that picture is there or not. The history of the meaning of the painting is confused, to say the least, as can be seen from the description at the Amsterdam Museum page. If this is important to you, I suggest that you spend more time discussing on the talk page and less time editing the article. If more important glaring things are damaged on the page, I will of course try to revert them. --Mlewan (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

While I appreciate your efforts, some of your edits have not been helpful. Adding grammatical errors is obviously not useful and making a large edit with vague edit summaries like "CE; source, link, grammar, flow, npov" is confusing as it's not always obvious what the POV section was. Try making several edits, one for CE one for NPOV, etc. so other editors can actually see what you've done and don't have to just revert the whole thing. As it is, I'm not the only editor questioning your efforts as my revert on Orientalism was seconded by another editor. I don't want to chase you away but you do need to be more careful with your edits. If grammar isn't your strength I suggest focusing on other types of edits. Thanks. freshacconci talk to me 14:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Huh?[edit]

Stop accusing me of "Nazi boosterism", I've done no such thing.--92.23.123.98 (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)