Hi, the Robert Mugabe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Q T C 19:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)you made to
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.--John (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --John (talk) 19:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is written by cooperation. Some of the things you wrote at the article Robert Mugabe are disagreed with by other editors. When this happens you need to discuss with other editors why you think your version is better than the one you are changing.
This discussion happens by editing talk pages, in this case Talk:Robert Mugabe. Please explain there why you think your version should be the one used. I would also ask you to read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, which indicates how Wikipedia deals with controversial subjects, and Wikipedia:References which explains how to add references to back up what yo write, and why you need to do that.
If you continue to edit Robert Mugabe without discussing changes you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please explain yourself at Talk:Robert Mugabe. DJ Clayworth (talk) 22:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)