User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits to the page Like a G6, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Yves (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010[edit]

  1. Information.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Like a G6, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Like a G6 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Carmichael95 (talk) 03:49, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Like a G6. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yves (talk) 04:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Response: I am consistently asking for discussion on the talk page. I am attempting to build consensus, whereas those who are attempting to remove entire sections without communication are warring. (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been reverted by four separate editors. This is indication that the addition is not constructive. If you add it again, you will most likely definitely be blocked for edit warring. Per the above template, please start a discussion on the talk page even if you believe you are correct and do no re-add it. Additionally, communication is a two-way street, so perhaps conversation with some editors or on the talk page would have been a better choice instead of communication through edit summaries. Thank you. Yves (talk) 04:47, 14 November 2010 (UTC)