User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Blog link[edit]

Do not continue to re-add the satirical blog to the Drew Bledsoe article. It is not appropriate. Please also take a look at Wikipedia's policies on external links and spam. ×Meegs 05:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Stop hand.svg
You will be blocked from editing if you reinsert that fake blog site into any article. Wikipedia is not a place for jokes, a place to defame people, or a collection of web links. ×Meegs 12:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ×Meegs 23:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zeta Tau Alpha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial 10:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zeta Tau Alpha, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial 11:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mr. Saturday Knight. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Please don't delete maintenance tags. They are used to maintain Wikipedia to encyclopedic standards. / edg 03:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Mass-deletion of maintenance tags from Family Guy articles[edit]

You might have a case, but you should attempt to build a consensus before making a disputable change to so many articles. Please stop doing this. / edg 03:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - KrakatoaKatie 07:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
You're right, the show relies on popular culture. That's why we don't need every last of them listed. This is Wikipedia, not a page for long lists. TheBlazikenMaster 17:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment - bad warning. Removing a batch of tags as inappropriate, when the tags were added in a batch, is a normal part of the consensus process. It is no more disruptive than adding the tags in the first place. The tags were not there before, so if a consensus needs to be built it is for adding the tags. Using administrative tools and threats of blocking to take sides on such an issue borders on abuse. Do not block this user without establishing a clear uncontroversial reason for doing so.Wikidemo 23:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
This user was asked on several occasions to discuss this action. At no time was there a reply, or any Talk page discussion anywhere. Whether or not you agree with this edit, not discussing it despite objections is contrary to WP:CONSENSUS, and doing so repeatedly despite repeated requests is reasonably blockable. / edg 04:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

That's incorrect. After the first round of deletes on those inappropriate tags, the changes were reverted saying that maintenance tags were removed without changing text -or including a comment-. Therefore I resolved that by removing the tags and indicating the comments why the tags detracted from the article.