User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Chivalry and Sorcery[edit]

Hi, I notice you deleted a bunch of material from Chivalry and Sorcery regarding the most recent edition of the game claiming that that edition is a copyright violation. I reverted the change. Wikipedia isn't censored, which means we can't suppress information about a publication just because the publication happens to be illegal somehow - see for example AACS encryption key controversy.

If the copyright status of the 4th edition of the game is indeed dubious how about adding information and references about that fact to the article? That's definitely the sort of thing that would be of interest in an article like this, it's better to inform readers. I can help write it up if you like. Bryan Derksen (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

BTW, I agree with your objection to the statement about Backhaus and the Tannoth supplement - I've tagged it and asked the user who inserted it for citations to back it up, I'll remove it if none are forthcoming. I'll see if I can find some additional citations for other parts of the article later today. Bryan Derksen (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Considering that the original author of those lines hasn't edited since September, I've gone ahead and moved the lines to the article's talk page for now. Could be a while before we see any response. Bryan Derksen (talk) 17:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Will change things slower to take into account wiki policy and available time. (talk) 20:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)