User talk:70.107.246.88

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

WikipediaUncleSam.JPG

Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Wikipedia without logging in to an account. I'm happy that you've been contributing. However, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:

There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, there are more pros here! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page like mine! So, unless you can think of a con, sign up for an account right now! -- Levine2112 discuss 17:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Button sig2.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Button sig2.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Homeopathy appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 17:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm puzzled by the non NPOV analysis here orangemarlin. The IP seemed to add a clarification of what the papers conclude. Why is that non neutral? Given this IP has made the same addition again, maybe you should explain the reasoning for your revert on the talk page, it does not appear to be blatant NPOV to me. What am I missing? David D. (Talk) 18:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


deleted comments[edit]

I didn't delete your comment, I moved it up a section, check the diff, where it had the appropriate context. David D. (Talk) 18:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Homeopathy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Button sig2.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Orangemarlin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Homeopathy notice[edit]

The homeopathy article and related pages are on article probation, due to past editing problems. Please read the terms at Talk:Homeopathy/Article probation and be sure to comply. Jehochman Talk 15:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Topic ban[edit]

For continued disruptive editing such as [1] and [2], you are hereby banned from editing any page related to homeopathy, broadly construed, for one month. Jehochman Talk 17:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Do you realize that the ban is totally unfair, unjustified and shows that your role here is to support a strong POV against the NOPV police and thus you are not the right editor to supervise this discussion? I will appeal that- it is evrything against you in this case .

-Unless this a mistake  ? --70.107.246.88 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

What have you done wrong? anyway, I agree with what you said on my talkpage you cannot cherry pick sources just because a good source says soemthing you personally disagree with as A Rubin appeared to do. Peter morrell 19:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Peter here. I'm not clear what the problem is. This editor has created a NPOV statement that is in line with the references cited, and he has not engaged in an edit war. What IS the problem? And is a one-month ban a fair punishment? Is everyone who makes changes in the article given this punishment? DanaUllmanTalk 17:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chameleon with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Puzzle, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Puzzle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pinethicket (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   -- Lear's Fool 15:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)