User talk:70.79.65.227

Admin Ricky81682

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I know it's you, User:Ramu50, avoiding your block. You need to request to be unblocked, not skip around your block. It's pretty clear. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Please see WP:Courtesy, calling people idiots [1] is not courteous. Zodon (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I will respect that policy, if the opposition is constantly having a bias attitude and only contributing Wikipedia for the sake of his interest than trying to make a world a better place. I said it one billion times before, either "we" work together or you block me forever, end of story. We, as in "ALL" of the users that have a problem against me, they either are in agreement not to violate a certain suggested guidelines or they'll be dealt with accordingly. --70.79.65.227 (talk) 11:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

ANI case

Hello, 70.79.65.227. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You can find the specific section here. Jeh (talk) 07:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked again

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

No point to playing around. You aren't being helpful at all anymore. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

As far as I am concern, you are the only administrators blocking me for no reason which is totally bias sadly to say. Yet true enough both opposition did violated WP:CIVIL, but every time when I am blocked, I said to each administrator if the opposition will behave maturely than I will do the same. The things I have promised about talk page contributions I have done so and my creditability counts. Yet the opposition is still not willing to come to an agreement, and yet they are not being warned or blocked, how very interesting that you are constantly being hypocrite by telling me to change, while not the others. And needless to say, the numerous accusation of I am a hassle is purely their excuse of evasion. As they don't have the ability to provide a great depth of knowledge toward contributing topic. As seen in Jeh Contributions, he revert more before even getting involved and despite that he isn't even involved with any WikiProject that even disrupt the community more, since he constantly publish his personal opinion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utility_computing&diff=257448638&oldid=257306538 A lot of article have made comparison and differences such as Imperative_programming#Imperative.2C_procedural.2C_and_declarative_programming, yet he insist on being narrowminded. So who exactly is being disruptive might I ask you loser.

A user that does have the following versus one who doesn't

• creditability
• WikiProject and Documentations vs constantly reverting by injecting, reverting personal opinions

Template_talk:Application_frameworks, in case you didn't know I even try to split this template like a mini-WikiProject, since a lot of programming have similarities and can be documented.

I have placed many template with the following

Example
== Related Template ==

• {{x}}

• Template:Linux/doc (version)
• Template:FOSS (version)
• Template talk:Application_frameworks#Expansion, Merging, Splitting...etc.
• Template:Python (programming language) (version)

sub-template notice: Template talk:Python Web Application Frameworks

• Template:DEC hardware (version)

x stand for related to the original template. A project that aims to restructure a template, so it doesn't get too big and it is similar to a documentation, but not complying to documentation, because on going development is constantly changing and it wouldn't make it any easier for documentation and restricting the info. --70.79.65.227 (talk) 11:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

70.79.65.227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • creation log • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

Requesting User:Ramu50's "(main page, talk page and subpages only)" not to be protected. Just because I have an indefinite block, it shouldn't mean I am not allow to edit my own subpages for future planning and proposal, for WikiProject.

Decline reason:

That is the point of the indefinite block. You're not allowed to edit here anymore, this includes your subpages. — either way (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Block extended

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Your behavior here is highly unfortunate, Ramu50. We told you to stop, repeatedly, and all you've done is continue the behavior that got your account indefinitely blocked in the first place.

I have placed a one-year block on this IP address. Please don't try it again with another IP address. You do not seem to understand how Wikipedia works. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Yea sure, whatever loser the fact is most of the time the only policy I violate was WP:Civil. You and the other are just as the same, become an administrators and violate whatever policy you like. The fact is you don't even follow the policy most of the time, what should other give a "f**k". By the way stop claiming how good you are care, because obviously most of the Wikipedian have had enough with your immaturity, consider how many times your User page have been vandalized, so don't try to talk me to anything, because you ain't go nothing. --70.79.65.227 (talk) 23:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)