About calling me a "menace" and "nuisance"...
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --ApolloBoy 06:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- As ApolloBoy stated above, please refrain from personal attacks or any type of derogatory comments. Please be civil and be respectful of other editors. Remeber, your discussing an issue not each other's personality. Please, be professional. Thank you for your corperation. Regards, Signaturebrendel 06:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Calling the work others "Vandalism"
To Apolloboy. Vandalism is intentional defacing. The work of other editors which adds information is not defacing. To simply remove that which disagrees with you is nearly as annoying as vandalism. The correct way to dispute information is to add a tag, not simply remove it and call it vandalism. If you claim that you are more mature than your age, then you had better act it, I was once as young and brash as you (and I'm still paying for it....) Watch the movie CARS, the world does not revolve around you. Make friends, and they will take care of you. Make enemies, and life will become miserable. Work with your fellow editors, do not accuse them of vandalism when they add useful information that is difficult or impossible to find elsewhere. If you go around saying you have the right to delete anything that is not backed up by a reference or footnote, you would not only have to remove the most valuable content, but just about 80% of everything, including the entire Matador article.
- Please stop accusing me of things I'm not guility of. I know what vandalism is, and it's something I'm against (I'm even a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit). --ApolloBoy 19:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
And writing about the relationship between AMC, the Matador, Premier and the LH cars is .... vandalism?? I'll apologize for calling you names, when you apologize for calling some careful research and analysis nonsense and vandalism, deal? You and I, we could rule the Wiki car pages, old guy and young guy. It is your destiny.......--18.104.22.168 06:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- None of that careful research and analysis matters when you don't have the proper references to back it up. Read this again so you get an idea of what I'm talking about. --ApolloBoy 01:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
And if you believe that, you might as well delete 98% of the content in the wikipedia. --22.214.171.124 01:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- And are 98% of the articles here made of original research? No, they're not. Read between the lines... --ApolloBoy 02:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
everybody knows the wp is useless as a scholarly research source but a riich source of stuff sonmebody knows that you cant find elsewhere. now go get some manners and concenntrate on adding or correcting, not deleting information or the work of others were both going to be here a long time. quiz what is the origiin of the v8 logo on the explorer, and is it valid to put that on the wp? hint, Ive already put it in the wp and tou will be seriously violating the spirit of wp if insist on removing this stuff btw, where are docs on cits? and what is your gpa in lang arts?
Your modifications to the RfM for Authorship of A Course in Miracles
In addition to being completely inappropriate comments to make in a request for mediation, you appear to have applied your comments to the wrong Request -- you applied them to the Authorship of A Course in Miracles request instead of the F-14 Tomcat request. Kickaha Ota 18:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Oops, could you put it in the right place, or show me the offending mistake??--126.96.36.199 15:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC) I'm matador300 when logged in.