User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The purpose of Talk:Tetragrammaton is discussions towards inmproving article "Tetragrammaton", not your completely irrelevant ranting political tirades... AnonMoos (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Q.E.D. and of course, Hypocrisy (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

And a nice reminder from the discussion, itself:

"Open letter to David Amos

David, you strike me as someone who has some religious sentiments. That being the case, I'd like to ask you to please try and have respect for Wikipedia and its rules, and stop trying to game the system by use of repeated sockpuppets. It isn't just a matter of breaking rules; it's really disrespectful to those of us who are trying to edit appropriately. There isn't one of us, I don't think, who hasn't accepted an edit (or several) that we disagree with on a personal level because this is Wikipedia, and not our personal blogs or online forums.

Please try and rein in your personal feelings and views and treat Wikipedia as it is meant to be treated. It's a great resource, and you have the ability to be an excellent editor, if only you can get your need to pursue this single minded agenda under control. -LisaLiel (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)"

If the sandal or shoe fits, I will wear it, too. (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Having reviewed the accuser's talk page, I will not add here the several complaints listed thereon, in addition to the various thanks and commendations, which seem to outnumber the complaints. However, the possible sockpuppet and various obvious emotional bias and instabilities charges seem interesting enough to wonder about -- and hope that the accuser is dealing with such Denial/OCD situations on his/her own, for the good of Wikipedia editing generally. (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)